From: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <vkoul@kernel.org>,
<ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Cc: <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: fix transfer failure
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:57:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <447057ae-235f-823c-b3a9-d1500e4f10f6@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05b78209-5e9a-410a-9307-21dc1410180a@nvidia.com>
On 9/16/2019 2:54 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 16/09/2019 09:37, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>> From Tegra186 onwards OUTSTANDING_REQUESTS field is added in channel
>> configuration register(bits 7:4) which defines the maximum number of reads
>> from the source and writes to the destination that may be outstanding at
>> any given point of time. This field must be programmed with a value
>> between 1 and 8. A value of 0 will prevent any transfers from happening.
>>
>> Thus added 'has_outstanding_reqs' bool member in chip data structure and is
>> set to false for Tegra210, since the field is not applicable. For Tegra186
>> it is set to true and channel configuration is updated with maximum
>> outstanding requests.
>>
>> Fixes: 433de642a76c ("dmaengine: tegra210-adma: add support for Tegra186/Tegra194")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
>> index 5f8adf5..e19732f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
>> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
>> #define TEGRA186_FIFO_CTRL_DEFAULT (TEGRA186_ADMA_CH_FIFO_CTRL_TXSIZE(3) | \
>> TEGRA186_ADMA_CH_FIFO_CTRL_RXSIZE(3))
>>
>> +#define TEGRA186_ADMA_CH_CONFIG_OUTSTANDING_REQS(reqs) (reqs << 4)
>> +
> Shouldn't we place this under the defines for ADMA_CH_CONFIG register?
> This would be consistent with how we organise the definitions today.
yes, will move.
>
>> #define ADMA_CH_REG_FIELD_VAL(val, mask, shift) (((val) & mask) << shift)
>>
>> struct tegra_adma;
>> @@ -77,6 +79,7 @@ struct tegra_adma;
>> * @ch_req_tx_shift: Register offset for AHUB transmit channel select.
>> * @ch_req_rx_shift: Register offset for AHUB receive channel select.
>> * @ch_base_offset: Register offset of DMA channel registers.
>> + * @has_outstanding_reqs: If DMA channel can have outstanding requests.
>> * @ch_fifo_ctrl: Default value for channel FIFO CTRL register.
>> * @ch_req_mask: Mask for Tx or Rx channel select.
>> * @ch_req_max: Maximum number of Tx or Rx channels available.
>> @@ -95,6 +98,7 @@ struct tegra_adma_chip_data {
>> unsigned int ch_req_max;
>> unsigned int ch_reg_size;
>> unsigned int nr_channels;
>> + bool has_outstanding_reqs;
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -594,6 +598,8 @@ static int tegra_adma_set_xfer_params(struct tegra_adma_chan *tdc,
>> ADMA_CH_CTRL_FLOWCTRL_EN;
>> ch_regs->config |= cdata->adma_get_burst_config(burst_size);
>> ch_regs->config |= ADMA_CH_CONFIG_WEIGHT_FOR_WRR(1);
>> + if (cdata->has_outstanding_reqs)
>> + ch_regs->config |= TEGRA186_ADMA_CH_CONFIG_OUTSTANDING_REQS(8);
>> ch_regs->fifo_ctrl = cdata->ch_fifo_ctrl;
>> ch_regs->tc = desc->period_len & ADMA_CH_TC_COUNT_MASK;
>>
>> @@ -778,6 +784,7 @@ static const struct tegra_adma_chip_data tegra210_chip_data = {
>> .ch_req_tx_shift = 28,
>> .ch_req_rx_shift = 24,
>> .ch_base_offset = 0,
>> + .has_outstanding_reqs = false,
>> .ch_fifo_ctrl = TEGRA210_FIFO_CTRL_DEFAULT,
>> .ch_req_mask = 0xf,
>> .ch_req_max = 10,
>> @@ -792,6 +799,7 @@ static const struct tegra_adma_chip_data tegra186_chip_data = {
>> .ch_req_tx_shift = 27,
>> .ch_req_rx_shift = 22,
>> .ch_base_offset = 0x10000,
>> + .has_outstanding_reqs = true,
>> .ch_fifo_ctrl = TEGRA186_FIFO_CTRL_DEFAULT,
>> .ch_req_mask = 0x1f,
>> .ch_req_max = 20,
>>
> Otherwise ...
>
> Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-16 8:37 [PATCH v3] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: fix transfer failure Sameer Pujar
2019-09-16 9:24 ` Jon Hunter
2019-09-16 9:27 ` Sameer Pujar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=447057ae-235f-823c-b3a9-d1500e4f10f6@nvidia.com \
--to=spujar@nvidia.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox