From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01486C4363D for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B932621D91 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726662AbgIXWFy (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:05:54 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:46631 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726702AbgIXWFw (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:05:52 -0400 IronPort-SDR: FGmcqjYZTPQ1qH/MCUqmH8gCgVQD3NjaiNhZQatO93qpCDKsUQAZV5J9gUKz6h2lSEGGqgE92J iGgmME5krYxA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9754"; a="222952993" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,299,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="222952993" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Sep 2020 15:05:51 -0700 IronPort-SDR: Oezyrdj/M3l0gJXPKkRKciKgrwvoJBY2QePT600tfvRabNY+6iI7vPej8IgrW/DHLoq49L+HGR IxzFX0ltXvrA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,299,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="336185644" Received: from djiang5-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.218.169]) ([10.212.218.169]) by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Sep 2020 15:05:50 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add shared workqueue support for idxd driver To: Borislav Petkov Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, jing.lin@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200924180041.34056-1-dave.jiang@intel.com> <20200924215136.GS5030@zn.tnic> From: Dave Jiang Message-ID: <71a1831b-b57f-610f-70b6-7d42cb889f20@intel.com> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:05:49 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200924215136.GS5030@zn.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org On 9/24/2020 2:51 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:32:35PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: >> Hi Vinod, >> Looks like we are cleared on the x86 patches for this series with sign offs >> from maintainer Boris. Please consider the series for 5.10 inclusion. Thank >> you! > > As I said here, I'd strongly suggest we do this: > > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org/thread/5FKNWNCCRV3AXUAEXUGQFF4EDQNANF3F/ > > and Vinod should merge the x86/pasid branch. Otherwise is his branch > and incomplete you could not have tested it properly. > Thanks Boris. Locally I have based on the latest dmaengine/next branch, merged in the x86/pasid branch, and then applied the series on top for testing. But yes, if Vinod accepts the series into his dmaengine/next tree, we will need all the parts for testing.