From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: dmaengine_desc_callback_valid(): Check for `callback_result`
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:43:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXYu33uHnr5F1NOj@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211023134101.28042-1-lars@metafoo.de>
On 23-10-21, 15:41, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Before the `callback_result` callback was introduced drivers coded their
> invocation to the callback in a similar way to:
>
> if (cb->callback) {
> spin_unlock(&dma->lock);
> cb->callback(cb->callback_param);
> spin_lock(&dma->lock);
> }
>
> With the introduction of `callback_result` two helpers where introduced to
> transparently handle both types of callbacks. And drivers where updated to
> look like this:
>
> if (dmaengine_desc_callback_valid(cb)) {
> spin_unlock(&dma->lock);
> dmaengine_desc_callback_invoke(cb, ...);
> spin_lock(&dma->lock);
> }
>
> dmaengine_desc_callback_invoke() correctly handles both `callback_result`
> and `callback`. But we forgot to update the dmaengine_desc_callback_valid()
> function to check for `callback_result`. As a result DMA descriptors that
> use the `callback_result` rather than `callback` don't have their callback
> invoked by drivers that follow the pattern above.
>
> Fix this by checking for both `callback` and `callback_result` in
> dmaengine_desc_callback_valid().
Thanks for the fix, applied now
--
~Vinod
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-23 13:41 [PATCH] dmaengine: dmaengine_desc_callback_valid(): Check for `callback_result` Lars-Peter Clausen
2021-10-24 18:19 ` Dave Jiang
2021-10-25 4:13 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXYu33uHnr5F1NOj@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox