From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE46C433F5 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234740AbiI2Qq6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:46:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59996 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235386AbiI2Qq5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:46:57 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BBEE1176D8 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:46:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD44E61E94 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92C0BC433D6; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:46:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1664470016; bh=2TGM4QiO91HIgiok5w6xD41afWkMkzHJeTF9h7pc0F8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lLB0rE157RXgLUqGX0yxBL4IpsMVAfvfjvkEqaWUaiq5kzN1iCD9bbDhL8SHEkTaN oQUpBEprq6UpALbOa5yipn75UvLEcZHJ8oNiiJlEsxLEOQiI17NnseaAXe8TK0MIWB A8lpaYd45xJws8kfaeTRHZiEebVbNqbHfLbC6ztkD8J/nN3QaeDQKr6QLFHA51zpEM A3y30mOR0FKRz89HiFoX2c9hi5EOng3sIPWbt+Sr+o7Svjhcs6JvFke9tsUpsP+xFh Bnc1DRnYfsT1MFWQmYKysdVncfJBEXC2TMNZGgL2WRo4L6k+sAKFqnFI55oAwVZfLB RMqDmeOYpcixQ== Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 22:16:52 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: "Yu, Fenghua" Cc: "Shen, Xiaochen" , "Jiang, Dave" , "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" , "Thomas, Ramesh" , "Luck, Tony" , "Zhu, Tony" , "Jia, Pei P" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: idxd: Fix max batch size issues for Intel IAA Message-ID: References: <20220808031922.29751-1-xiaochen.shen@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org On 15-09-22, 16:21, Yu, Fenghua wrote: > Hi, Vinod, > > > Fix max batch size related issues for Intel IAA: > > 1. Fix max batch size default values. > > 2. Make max batch size attributes in sysfs invisible. > > Any comment on this patch set? Would you apply it? This does not apply for me (i guess due to other idxd patches I have applied today), pls rebase on next and resend -- ~Vinod