From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Cc: Frank.li@nxp.com, vkoul@kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: qcom: gpi: remove unused struct 'reg_info'
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 23:04:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zkfidbh3Sqy6BEDh@gallifrey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fe6e86d-5b4d-4b3c-a5d7-59f01dc6b0bc@linaro.org>
* Bryan O'Donoghue (bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org) wrote:
> On 17/05/2024 12:19, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > If you look at the V1 I had
> > > ''gpi_desc' seems like it was never used.
> > > Remove it.'
> > >
> > > but Frank suggested copying the subject line; so I'm not sure
> > > whether you want more or less!
> > >
> > > I could change this to:
> > >
> > > 'gpi_desc' was never used since it's initial
> > > commit 5d0c3533a19f ("dmaengine: qcom: Add GPI dma driver")
> > Oops, of course I mean 'reg_info' which is what I fixed in v2.
> >
> > > Would you be OK with that?
> > Dave
> >
> > > Dave
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I saw your v1 interaction after commenting but, I still think commits that
> say "this removes a data structure" should elaborate more.
>
> "This structure is no longer used since commit: 12charsubshahere" or "This
> structure was never used and should be considered dead code"
>
> I generally hope the intention of my commits is clear from the code with the
> commit log adding whatever context or elaboration on top.
>
> So that's what I'm suggesting here. A bit of commit log sugar on top which
> elaborates on and justifies the change.
OK, so how about the version I suggested above:
'reg_info' was never used since it's initial
commit 5d0c3533a19f ("dmaengine: qcom: Add GPI dma driver")
Remove it.
Is that OK with you?
Dave
>
> ---
> bod
>
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-17 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-16 15:25 [PATCH v2] dmaengine: qcom: gpi: remove unused struct 'reg_info' linux
2024-05-17 9:11 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-05-17 11:09 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2024-05-17 11:19 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2024-05-17 22:58 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-05-17 23:04 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2024-05-17 23:13 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2024-05-17 23:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zkfidbh3Sqy6BEDh@gallifrey \
--to=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox