From: Yi Sun <yi.sun@intel.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Cc: <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>, <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
<gordon.jin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dmaengine: idxd: Remove improper idxd_free
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 17:02:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIXrCM10dxz0LxRb@ysun46-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d4b51d33-e46b-448d-b6d3-f0845b1d05f8@nvidia.com>
On 17.06.2025 15:13, Fenghua Yu wrote:
>Hi, Yi,
>
>On 6/17/25 03:27, Yi Sun wrote:
>>The call to idxd_free() introduces a duplicate put_device() leading to a
>>reference count underflow:
>>refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
>>WARNING: CPU: 15 PID: 4428 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xbe/0x110
>>...
>>Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> idxd_remove+0xe4/0x120 [idxd]
>> pci_device_remove+0x3f/0xb0
>> device_release_driver_internal+0x197/0x200
>> driver_detach+0x48/0x90
>> bus_remove_driver+0x74/0xf0
>> pci_unregister_driver+0x2e/0xb0
>> idxd_exit_module+0x34/0x7a0 [idxd]
>> __do_sys_delete_module.constprop.0+0x183/0x280
>> do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd70
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
>>
>>The idxd_unregister_devices() which is invoked at the very beginning of
>>idxd_remove(), already takes care of the necessary put_device() through the
>>following call path:
>>idxd_unregister_devices() -> device_unregister() -> put_device()
>>
>>In addition, when CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE is enabled, put_device() may
>>trigger asynchronous cleanup via schedule_delayed_work(). If idxd_free() is
>>called immediately after, it can result in a use-after-free.
>>
>>Remove the improper idxd_free() to avoid both the refcount underflow and
>>potential memory corruption during module unload.
>>
>>Fixes: d5449ff1b04d ("dmaengine: idxd: Add missing idxd cleanup to fix memory leak in remove call")
>>Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yi.sun@intel.com>
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c b/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
>>index 80355d03004d..40cc9c070081 100644
>>--- a/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
>>+++ b/drivers/dma/idxd/init.c
>>@@ -1295,7 +1295,6 @@ static void idxd_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> idxd_cleanup(idxd);
>> pci_iounmap(pdev, idxd->reg_base);
>> put_device(idxd_confdev(idxd));
>>- idxd_free(idxd);
>
>Simply removing idxd_free() causes two issues:
>
>1. This hits memory leak issues because allocated idxd, ida, map are
>not freed.
>
>2. There is still an underflow issue for dev refcnt in
>idxd_pci_probe_alloc() when idxd_register_devices() fails. Here
>get_device() is not called but put_device() is called.
>
>A right fix is to remove the put_device() in idxd_free(). This will
>fix all the above issues.
>
>Thanks.
>
>-Fenghua
>
Hi Fenghua,
From my understanding, the function idxd_conf_device_release already
covers everything done in idxd_free, including:
bitmap_free(idxd->opcap_bmap);
ida_free(&idxd_ida, idxd->id);
kfree(idxd);
At least the newly added idxd_free in commit 90022b3 doesn't resolve
any memory leaks, but introduces several duplicated cleanup.
reference:
```
static void idxd_free(struct idxd_device *idxd)
{
if (!idxd)
return;
put_device(idxd_confdev(idxd));
bitmap_free(idxd->opcap_bmap);
ida_free(&idxd_ida, idxd->id);
kfree(idxd);
}
```
V.S.
```
static void idxd_conf_device_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct idxd_device *idxd = confdev_to_idxd(dev);
kfree(idxd->groups);
bitmap_free(idxd->wq_enable_map);
kfree(idxd->wqs);
kfree(idxd->engines);
kfree(idxd->evl);
kmem_cache_destroy(idxd->evl_cache);
ida_free(&idxd_ida, idxd->id);
bitmap_free(idxd->opcap_bmap);
kfree(idxd);
}
```
Thanks
--Sun, Yi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-27 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-17 10:27 [PATCH v3 0/2] dmaengine: idxd: Fix refcount and cleanup issues on module unload Yi Sun
2025-06-17 10:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dmaengine: idxd: Remove improper idxd_free Yi Sun
2025-06-17 22:13 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-07-27 9:02 ` Yi Sun [this message]
2025-07-28 8:21 ` Shuai Xue
2025-06-17 10:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] dmaengine: idxd: Fix refcount underflow on module unload Yi Sun
2025-06-17 21:58 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-06-18 0:38 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2025-07-27 9:16 ` Yi Sun
2025-07-28 8:40 ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-28 11:43 ` Yi Sun
2025-07-29 2:46 ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-29 3:15 ` Yi Sun
2025-07-29 6:00 ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-31 0:17 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aIXrCM10dxz0LxRb@ysun46-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=yi.sun@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=gordon.jin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox