From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@kernel.org>,
Xuelin Shi <xuelin.shi@freescale.com>,
Harninder Rai <harninder.rai@freescale.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] dmaengine: fsl_raid: free resources in probe
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:56:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amAHLyNM25898nQz@SMW015318> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKxU2N8Gw+3Cgkk7FvGVoR2V-hDUafVT6H_OOGS5Jd67BNWp1Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 02:53:17PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 2:43 PM Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 12:54:22PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> > > Add free_irq() in the error unwind of fsl_re_chan_probe() and in
> > > fsl_re_remove_chan() so the interrupt is always released.
> > >
> > > Also add tasklet_kill(). Present in _remove but not _probe.
> > >
> > > Also add platform_device_put on failure as of_platform_device_create()
platform_device_put()
> > > increases the reference count and needs platform_device_put on failure.
> > > Requires placing the pointer in the struct for the _remove function.
> > > While at it, use platform_get/set_drvdata as there's no need for using a
> > > device pointer for that.
Needn't "While at ..."
> > >
> > > Fixes: ad80da658bbc ("dmaengine: Driver support for FSL RaidEngine device.")
> > > Assisted-by: opencode:hy3-free
> > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> > > drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> > > index 2d54879cd6e1..cabc79e61e85 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.c
> > > @@ -661,8 +661,7 @@ static int fsl_re_chan_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> > > chan_ofdev = of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, dev);
> > > if (!chan_ofdev) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "Not able to create ofdev for jr %d\n", q);
> > > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > > - goto err_free;
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* read reg property from dts */
> > > @@ -688,17 +687,19 @@ static int fsl_re_chan_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> > > chandev = &chan_ofdev->dev;
> > > tasklet_setup(&chan->irqtask, fsl_re_dequeue);
> > >
> > > + platform_set_drvdata(chan_ofdev, chan);
> >
> > Previous patch already set, why need set again?
> This is because request_irq uses platform_get_drvdata.
>
> On further review, I think chan should be passed directly.
Yes
Frank
> >
> > Frank
> > > ret = request_irq(chan->irq, fsl_re_isr, 0, chan->name, chan_ofdev);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "Unable to register interrupt for JR %d\n", q);
> > > ret = -EINVAL;
> > > - goto err_free;
> > > + goto err_free_tasklet;
> > > }
> > >
> > > re_priv->re_jrs[q] = chan;
> > > chan->chan.device = dma_dev;
> > > chan->chan.private = chan;
> > > chan->dev = chandev;
> > > + chan->ofdev = chan_ofdev;
> > > chan->re_dev = re_priv;
> > >
> > > spin_lock_init(&chan->desc_lock);
> > > @@ -712,7 +713,7 @@ static int fsl_re_chan_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> > > if (!chan->inb_ring_virt_addr) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "No dma memory for inb_ring_virt_addr\n");
> > > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > - goto err_free;
> > > + goto err_free_irq;
> > > }
> > >
> > > chan->oub_ring_virt_addr = dma_pool_alloc(chan->re_dev->hw_desc_pool,
> > > @@ -744,8 +745,6 @@ static int fsl_re_chan_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> > > out_be32(&chan->jrregs->jr_config_1,
> > > FSL_RE_CFG1_CBSI | FSL_RE_CFG1_CBS0 | status);
> > >
> > > - platform_set_drvdata(chan_ofdev, chan);
> > > -
> > > /* Enable RE/CHAN */
> > > out_be32(&chan->jrregs->jr_command, FSL_RE_ENABLE);
> > >
> > > @@ -754,7 +753,12 @@ static int fsl_re_chan_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev,
> > > err_free_1:
> > > dma_pool_free(chan->re_dev->hw_desc_pool, chan->inb_ring_virt_addr,
> > > chan->inb_phys_addr);
> > > +err_free_irq:
> > > + free_irq(chan->irq, chan_ofdev);
> > > +err_free_tasklet:
> > > + tasklet_kill(&chan->irqtask);
> > > err_free:
> > > + of_platform_device_destroy(chan_ofdev);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -892,6 +896,8 @@ static int fsl_re_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> > >
> > > static void fsl_re_remove_chan(struct fsl_re_chan *chan)
> > > {
> > > + free_irq(chan->irq, chan->ofdev);
> > > +
> > > tasklet_kill(&chan->irqtask);
> > >
> > > dma_pool_free(chan->re_dev->hw_desc_pool, chan->inb_ring_virt_addr,
> > > @@ -899,6 +905,8 @@ static void fsl_re_remove_chan(struct fsl_re_chan *chan)
> > >
> > > dma_pool_free(chan->re_dev->hw_desc_pool, chan->oub_ring_virt_addr,
> > > chan->oub_phys_addr);
> > > +
> > > + of_platform_device_destroy(chan->ofdev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void fsl_re_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h
> > > index adbfede330a7..34d362803610 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl_raid.h
> > > @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ struct fsl_re_chan {
> > > struct list_head active_q; /* already issued on hw, not completed */
> > > struct list_head submit_q;
> > > struct list_head free_q; /* alloc available queue */
> > > + struct platform_device *ofdev;
> > > struct device *dev;
> > > struct fsl_re_drv_private *re_dev;
> > > struct dma_chan chan;
> > > --
> > > 2.55.0
> > >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 19:54 [PATCHv2 0/2] dmaengine: fsl_raid: fix resource leaks and simplify drvdata handling Rosen Penev
2026-07-21 19:54 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] dmaengine: fsl_raid: pass platform_device to drvdata Rosen Penev
2026-07-21 21:38 ` Frank Li
2026-07-21 19:54 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] dmaengine: fsl_raid: free resources in probe Rosen Penev
2026-07-21 21:43 ` Frank Li
2026-07-21 21:53 ` Rosen Penev
2026-07-21 23:56 ` Frank Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amAHLyNM25898nQz@SMW015318 \
--to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=harninder.rai@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=xuelin.shi@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox