From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
Cc: "Viresh Kumar" <vireshk@kernel.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>, "Frank Li" <Frank.Li@kernel.org>,
"Dan Williams" <djbw@kernel.org>,
"Serge Semin" <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] dmaengine: dw: calculate residue separately from completion
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 10:16:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auS01eEyWjGD03MQ@SMW015318> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029-submit-dw-dma-synchronize-v1-v4-4-fea447d9f285@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 04:29:38PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
dmaengine: dw: move residue calculation into helper dwc_get_hard_llp_desc_residue()
> From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
>
> The descriptor scanner mixes transfer-complete handling with hardware-LLP
> residue calculation. A status query needs the latter for the requested
> cookie even when no transfer-complete event is pending.
>
> Move hardware-LLP residue calculation into its own helper and call it from
> the status getter under the channel lock. Keep software-LLP progress in
> the scanner and subtract the current block's progress when reporting its
> residue. The scanner now handles transfer-complete events only, retaining
> the distinction between zero source residue and destination completion.
>
> Also search the queued descriptors so a transfer waiting to start reports
> its full length instead of zero residue.
>
> Fixes: 3bfb1d20b547 ("dmaengine: Driver for the Synopsys DesignWare DMA controller")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
> [james: retain polled completion and report queued residue]
> Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changelog RFC:
> - Instead of just dropping the dwc_scan_descriptors() method invocation
> calculate the residue in the Tx-status getter.
> ---
> drivers/dma/dw/core.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c
> index 1f7afcd01565..1d6419e1cd3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw/core.c
> @@ -274,123 +274,60 @@ static inline u32 dwc_get_sent(struct dw_dma_chan *dwc)
>
> static void dwc_scan_descriptors(struct dw_dma *dw, struct dw_dma_chan *dwc)
> {
> - dma_addr_t llp;
> struct dw_desc *desc, *_desc;
> struct dw_desc *child;
> - u32 status_xfer;
> unsigned long flags;
> LIST_HEAD(list);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
> - llp = channel_readl(dwc, LLP);
> - status_xfer = dma_readl(dw, RAW.XFER);
>
> - if (status_xfer & dwc->mask) {
> - /* Everything we've submitted is done */
> - dma_writel(dw, CLEAR.XFER, dwc->mask);
> - if (list_empty(&dwc->active_list)) {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (test_bit(DW_DMA_IS_SOFT_LLP, &dwc->flags)) {
> - struct list_head *head, *active = dwc->tx_node_active;
> -
> - /*
> - * We are inside first active descriptor.
> - * Otherwise something is really wrong.
> - */
> - desc = dwc_first_active(dwc);
> -
> - head = &desc->tx_list;
> - if (active != head) {
> - /* Update residue to reflect last sent descriptor */
> - if (active == head->next)
> - desc->residue -= desc->len;
> - else
> - desc->residue -= to_dw_desc(active->prev)->len;
> -
> - child = to_dw_desc(active);
> + if (!(dma_readl(dw, RAW.XFER) & dwc->mask))
> + goto unlock;
>
> - /* Submit next block */
> - dwc_do_single_block(dwc, child);
> + dma_writel(dw, CLEAR.XFER, dwc->mask);
> + if (list_empty(&dwc->active_list))
> + goto unlock;
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> - return;
> - }
> + desc = dwc_first_active(dwc);
> + if (test_bit(DW_DMA_IS_SOFT_LLP, &dwc->flags)) {
> + struct list_head *head = &desc->tx_list;
> + struct list_head *active = dwc->tx_node_active;
>
> - /* We are done here */
> - clear_bit(DW_DMA_IS_SOFT_LLP, &dwc->flags);
> - }
> + if (active != head) {
> + /* Update residue to reflect last sent descriptor. */
> + if (active == head->next)
> + desc->residue -= desc->len;
> + else
> + desc->residue -= to_dw_desc(active->prev)->len;
>
> - if (dma_readl(dw, CH_EN) & dwc->mask) {
> - dev_err(chan2dev(&dwc->chan),
> - "BUG: XFER bit set, but channel not idle!\n");
> + child = to_dw_desc(active);
>
> - /* Try to continue after resetting the channel... */
> - dwc_chan_disable(dw, dwc);
> + /* Submit next block, including for polled transfers. */
> + dwc_do_single_block(dwc, child);
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> - /* Detach the completed transfer before starting queued work. */
> - list_splice_init(&dwc->active_list, &list);
> - list_for_each_entry(desc, &list, desc_node)
> - dma_cookie_complete(&desc->txd);
> - dwc_dostart_first_queued(dwc);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, &list, desc_node) {
> - list_del_init(&desc->desc_node);
> - dwc_descriptor_free(dwc, desc, true);
> - }
> - return;
> + clear_bit(DW_DMA_IS_SOFT_LLP, &dwc->flags);
> }
>
> - if (list_empty(&dwc->active_list)) {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> - return;
> - }
> + if (dma_readl(dw, CH_EN) & dwc->mask) {
> + dev_err(chan2dev(&dwc->chan),
> + "BUG: XFER bit set, but channel not idle!\n");
>
> - if (test_bit(DW_DMA_IS_SOFT_LLP, &dwc->flags)) {
> - dev_vdbg(chan2dev(&dwc->chan), "%s: soft LLP mode\n", __func__);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> - return;
> + /* Try to continue after resetting the channel... */
> + dwc_chan_disable(dw, dwc);
> }
>
> - dev_vdbg(chan2dev(&dwc->chan), "%s: llp=%pad\n", __func__, &llp);
> -
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, &dwc->active_list, desc_node) {
> - /* Initial residue value */
> - desc->residue = desc->total_len;
> -
> - /* Check first descriptors addr */
> - if (desc->txd.phys == DWC_LLP_LOC(llp)) {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - /* Check first descriptors llp */
> - if (lli_read(desc, llp) == llp) {
> - /* This one is currently in progress */
> - desc->residue -= dwc_get_sent(dwc);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - desc->residue -= desc->len;
> - list_for_each_entry(child, &desc->tx_list, desc_node) {
> - if (lli_read(child, llp) == llp) {
> - /* Currently in progress */
> - desc->residue -= dwc_get_sent(dwc);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> - return;
> - }
> - desc->residue -= child->len;
> - }
> + dma_cookie_complete(&desc->txd);
> + list_move_tail(&desc->desc_node, &list);
> + dwc_dostart_first_queued(dwc);
> +unlock:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
>
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _desc, &list, desc_node) {
> + list_del_init(&desc->desc_node);
> + dwc_descriptor_free(dwc, desc, true);
> }
> -
> - /* Residue describes source reads; only RAW.XFER completes a transfer. */
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
> }
>
> static inline void dwc_dump_lli(struct dw_dma_chan *dwc, struct dw_desc *desc)
> @@ -969,9 +906,39 @@ static struct dw_desc *dwc_find_desc(struct dw_dma_chan *dwc, dma_cookie_t c)
> if (desc->txd.cookie == c)
> return desc;
>
> + list_for_each_entry(desc, &dwc->queue, desc_node)
> + if (desc->txd.cookie == c)
> + return desc;
> +
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static u32 dwc_get_hard_llp_desc_residue(struct dw_dma_chan *dwc, struct dw_desc *desc)
> +{
> + u32 residue = desc->total_len;
> + struct dw_desc *child;
> + dma_addr_t llp;
> +
> + llp = channel_readl(dwc, LLP);
> +
> + /* The first descriptor may still be waiting to be fetched. */
> + if (desc->txd.phys == DWC_LLP_LOC(llp))
> + return residue;
> +
> + if (lli_read(desc, llp) == llp)
> + return residue - dwc_get_sent(dwc);
> +
> + residue -= desc->len;
> + list_for_each_entry(child, &desc->tx_list, desc_node) {
> + if (lli_read(child, llp) == llp)
> + return residue - dwc_get_sent(dwc);
> +
> + residue -= child->len;
> + }
> +
> + return residue;
> +}
This patch still too big. You can create new helper()
dwc_get_hard_llp_desc_residue() and replace orginal code exactly, then
change gradulatly.
Frank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 22:29 [PATCH v4 0/7] dmaengine: dw: serialize completion and termination James Hilliard
2026-10-29 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] dmaengine: dw: Fix XFER bit set, but channel not idle error James Hilliard
2026-10-30 15:00 ` Frank Li
2026-10-29 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] dmaengine: dw: serialize error recovery with channel termination James Hilliard
2026-10-29 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] dmaengine: dw: complete cookies before releasing the channel lock James Hilliard
2026-10-30 15:07 ` Frank Li
2026-10-29 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] dmaengine: dw: calculate residue separately from completion James Hilliard
2026-10-30 15:16 ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-10-29 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] dmaengine: dw: drain the tasklet before releasing channel resources James Hilliard
2026-10-30 15:29 ` Frank Li
2026-10-29 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] dmaengine: dw: synchronize completion callbacks James Hilliard
2026-10-29 22:29 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] dmaengine: dw: Prevent tx-status calling DMA-desc callback James Hilliard
2026-10-30 15:54 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auS01eEyWjGD03MQ@SMW015318 \
--to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=james.hilliard1@gmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox