Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: dma: Ingenic: DT bindings for Ingenic PDMA

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 28/02/2024 02:24, bin.yao wrote:
> From: byao <bin.yao@ingenic.com>
> 
> Convert the textual documentation for the Ingenic SoCs PDMA
> Controller devicetree binding to YAML.
> 
> Add a dt-bindings header, and convert the device trees to it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: byao <bin.yao@ingenic.com>
> Signed-off-by: rick <rick.tyliu@ingenic.com>

Use full names.

Except that, nothing here was tested, so limited review follows.

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "DT bindings for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18

> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,pdma.yaml | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
>  include/dt-bindings/dma/ingenic-pdma.h        | 51 ++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 128 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,pdma.yaml
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/dma/ingenic-pdma.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,pdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,pdma.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b3f3a8f0b813
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ingenic,pdma.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dma/ingenic,dma.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Ingenic SoCs DMA Controller DT bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - byao <bin.yao@ingenic.com>
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: "dma-controller.yaml#"
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:

Drop

> +      - enum:
> +          - ingenic,m200-pdma
> +          - ingenic,x1000-pdma
> +          - ingenic,t40-pdma
> +          - ingenic,t41-pdma
> +          - ingenic,t33-pdma
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupts-parent:
> +    maxItems: 1

Drop interrupts-parent

> +
> +  interrupts-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: pdam
> +      - const: pdmam
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1

Nope, you have two items. Test your DTS.

> +
> +  dma-channels:
> +    const: 32
> +
> +  "#dma-cells":
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: gate_pdma
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - interrupt-parent
> +  - interrupt-names
> +  - interrupts
> +  - clocks
> +  - clock-names
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/ingenic,t33-cgu.h>
> +    pdma:dma@13420000 {
> +      compatible = "ingenic,t33-pdma";
> +      reg = <0x13420000 0x10000>;
> +      interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
> +      interrupt-names = "pdma", "pdmam";
> +      interrupts = <10 61>;
> +      #dma-channels = <0x20>;
> +      #dma-cells = <0x1>;
> +      clocks = <&cgu T33_CLK_DMA>;
> +      clock-names = "gate_pdma";
> +    };
> +
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/dma/ingenic-pdma.h b/include/dt-bindings/dma/ingenic-pdma.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..99c871bc0ea8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/dma/ingenic-pdma.h

Same filename as binding.

> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause */
> +
> +#ifndef __INGENIC_PDMA_H__
> +#define __INGENIC_PDMA_H__
> +
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_AIC_LOOP_RX	0x5

Indexes start from 0. If these are not indexes, then these are neither
suitable for bindings. Hex for sure is questionable.

> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_AIC_TX		0x6
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_AIC_F_RX	0x7
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_AUTO_TX		0x8
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SADC_RX		0x9
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART5_TX	0xa
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART5_RX	0xb
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART4_TX	0xc
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART4_RX	0xd
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART3_TX	0xe
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART3_RX	0xf
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART2_TX	0x10
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART2_RX	0x11
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART1_TX	0x12
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART1_RX	0x13
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART0_TX	0x14
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_UART0_RX	0x15
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SSI0_TX		0x16
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SSI0_RX		0x17
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SSI1_TX		0x18
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SSI1_RX		0x19
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SLV_TX		0x1a
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_SLV_RX		0x1b
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C0_TX		0x24
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C0_RX		0x25
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C1_TX		0x26
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C1_RX		0x27
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C2_TX		0x28
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_I2C2_RX		0x29
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_DES_TX		0x2e
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_REQ_DES_RX		0x2f
> +
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_TYPE_REQ_MSK	0xff

Nope, not a binding.

> +#define INGENIC_DMA_TYPE_CH_SFT		8
> +#define INGENIC_DMA_TYPE_CH_MSK		(0xff << INGENIC_DMA_TYPE_CH_SFT)

Drop entire file.

Best regards,
Krzysztof