Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindindgs: i2c: qcom,i2c-geni: Document shared flag

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 29/11/2024 15:43, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote:
> Adds qcom,shared-se flag usage. Use this flag when I2C serial controller
> needs to be shared in multiprocessor system(APPS,Modem,ADSP) environment.
> 
> SE(Serial Engine HW controller acting as protocol master controller) is an
> I2C controller. Basically a programmable SERDES(serializer/deserializer)
> coupled with data DMA entity, capable in handling a bus protocol, and data
> moves to/from system memory.
> 
> Two clients from different processors can share an I2C controller for same
> slave device OR their owned slave devices. Assume I2C Slave EEPROM device
> connected with I2C controller. Each client from ADSP SS and APPS Linux SS
> can perform i2c transactions.
> 
> Transfer gets serialized by Lock TRE + DMA xfer + Unlock TRE at HW level.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml       | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml
> index 9f66a3bb1f80..88682a333399 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml
> @@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ properties:
>    power-domains:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  qcom,shared-se:
> +    description: True if I2C controller is shared between two or more system processors.
> +        SE(Serial Engine HW controller working as protocol master controller) is an
> +        I2C controller. Basically, a programmable SERDES(serializer/deserializer)
> +        coupled with data DMA entity, capable in handling a bus protocol, and data
> +        moves to/from system memory.
I replied why I NAK it. You did not really address my concerns, but
replied with some generic statement. After that generic statement you
gave me exactly 0 seconds to react and you sent v5.

Really 0 seconds to respond to your comment, while you give yourself
days to respond to my comments.

This is not how it works.

NAK

Implement previous feedback. Don't send any new versions before you
understand what you have to do and get some agreement with reviewers.

Best regards,
Krzysztof