DMA Engine development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Allen Pais" <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 23/33] dmaengine: timb_dma: route callbacks via channel BH
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 18:04:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-207555@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9f90c61446942c160480ee81e220869de918105.1794315350.git.allen.lkml@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] dmaengine: timb_dma: race in __td_ier_mask() and TIMBDMA_IER
  updates
- [High] dmaengine: timb_dma: race between timb_dma_chan_bh() and
  channel teardown
--

commit dc5312469115907bacab896cc42d4d204804abfc
Author: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>

dmaengine: timb_dma: route callbacks via channel BH

This commit moves per-channel DMA completion handling from the controller
tasklet to per-channel BH work items and drains the BH work during channel
teardown and driver removal.

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/timb_dma.c b/drivers/dma/timb_dma.c
> index 0acd7a36a3d0d..d24508e2a0bbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/timb_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/timb_dma.c
> @@ -433,6 +433,8 @@ static void td_free_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dmaengine_chan_dev(chan), "%s: Entry\n", __func__);
>  
> +	dmaengine_kill_bh(&td_chan->chan);
> +
>  	/* check that all descriptors are free */
>  	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&td_chan->active_list));
>  	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&td_chan->queue));
> @@ -575,17 +577,42 @@ static void td_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
>  	for (i = 0; i < td->dma.chancnt; i++)
>  		if (ipr & (1 << i)) {
>  			struct timb_dma_chan *td_chan = td->channels + i;
> -			spin_lock(&td_chan->lock);
> -			__td_finish(td_chan);
> -			if (!list_empty(&td_chan->queue))
> -				__td_start_next(td_chan);
> -			spin_unlock(&td_chan->lock);
> +			dmaengine_schedule_bh(&td_chan->chan);
>  		}
>  
>  	ier = __td_ier_mask(td);
>  	iowrite32(ier, td->membase + TIMBDMA_IER);
>  }
>  
> +static void timb_dma_chan_bh(struct dma_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	struct timb_dma_chan *td_chan = container_of(chan, struct timb_dma_chan,
> +						     chan);
> +	struct timb_dma *td = tdchantotd(td_chan);
> +	u32 ier;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&td_chan->lock);
> +	__td_finish(td_chan);
> +	if (!list_empty(&td_chan->queue))
> +		__td_start_next(td_chan);
> +	spin_unlock(&td_chan->lock);

[Severity: High]
Can a pending timb_dma_chan_bh() work item prematurely complete a newly
submitted transfer after td_terminate_all() or td_issue_pending()?

Previously, td_tasklet() took td_chan->lock and finished the active
descriptor immediately.  Now, td_tasklet() only schedules the channel BH
work, and td_terminate_all() tears down the active descriptor without
canceling or flushing that work:

CPU0 (<softirq>)                  CPU1
td_tasklet()
  dmaengine_schedule_bh()
                                  td_terminate_all()
                                    spin_lock_bh(&td_chan->lock)
                                    __td_finish(td_chan)
                                    spin_unlock_bh(&td_chan->lock)
                                  td_tx_submit()
                                    spin_lock_bh(&td_chan->lock)
                                    __td_start_dma(td_chan)
                                    spin_unlock_bh(&td_chan->lock)
timb_dma_chan_bh()
  spin_lock(&td_chan->lock)
  __td_finish(td_chan)  <-- stops and unmaps the new in-flight transfer

When the stale BH work runs, __td_finish() unmaps and completes the newly
started descriptor at the head of td_chan->active_list while hardware DMA is
still in flight.

In addition, dmaengine_kill_bh() in td_free_chan_resources() only flushes
td_chan->chan.bh_work without waiting for td->tasklet.  If td_tasklet() is
pending or running on another CPU, it can schedule the channel BH after
dmaengine_kill_bh() returns, or leave td_chan->active_list non-empty when
td_free_chan_resources() reaches BUG_ON(!list_empty(&td_chan->active_list)).

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The controller tasklet re-armed IER before this channel was
> +	 * finished. Recompute it now that the channel state has changed.
> +	 */
> +	ier = __td_ier_mask(td);
> +	iowrite32(ier, td->membase + TIMBDMA_IER);
> +}

[Severity: High]
Does calling __td_ier_mask(td) and writing TIMBDMA_IER without holding the
channel locks race with concurrent channel completions and starts?

Previously, __td_finish() and __td_start_next() ran sequentially inside the
single controller tasklet before calling __td_ier_mask(td).  Now, both
td_tasklet() and each channel's timb_dma_chan_bh() call __td_ier_mask(td)
without holding any td_chan->lock:

drivers/dma/timb_dma.c:__td_ier_mask() {
	for (i = 0; i < td->dma.chancnt; i++) {
		struct timb_dma_chan *td_chan = td->channels + i;
		if (td_chan->ongoing) {
			struct timb_dma_desc *td_desc =
				list_entry(td_chan->active_list.next,
				struct timb_dma_desc, desc_node);
			if (td_desc->interrupt)
				ret |= 1 << i;
		}
	}
}

If another CPU is inside __td_finish() (from another channel's BH,
td_terminate_all(), or td_issue_pending()), __td_ier_mask() can observe
td_chan->ongoing == true while list_move() empties td_chan->active_list:

CPU0                              CPU1
timb_dma_chan_bh()                __td_finish(td_chan)
  spin_unlock(&td_chan->lock)
  __td_ier_mask(td)
    if (td_chan->ongoing)
                                    td_chan->ongoing = false;
                                    list_move(&td_desc->desc_node,
                                              &td_chan->free_list);
      td_desc = list_entry(
        td_chan->active_list.next, ...)
      if (td_desc->interrupt)  <-- out-of-bounds read off list head

When active_list is empty, active_list.next points to &td_chan->active_list
itself, so reading td_desc->interrupt reads past struct timb_dma_chan (and
past the end of the struct timb_dma slab allocation on the last channel), or
reads a freed descriptor if td_free_chan_resources() frees free_list.

Second, writing ier to TIMBDMA_IER outside any lock races with
__td_enable_chan_irq() when another channel starts a transfer, overwriting
TIMBDMA_IER with a stale mask and losing that channel's completion
interrupt.

Third, td_irq() masks interrupts by writing 0 to TIMBDMA_IER and relies on
td_tasklet() to clear TIMBDMA_ISR before re-enabling TIMBDMA_IER.  Because
td_tasklet() now writes TIMBDMA_IER before timb_dma_chan_bh() runs
__td_finish() to stop RX DMA and clear ongoing, and because
timb_dma_chan_bh() can also write TIMBDMA_IER after td_irq() masks it for
another channel but before td_tasklet() acknowledges TIMBDMA_ISR, an
unacknowledged interrupt can be unmasked immediately and re-trigger
td_irq().

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1794315350.git.allen.lkml@gmail.com?part=23

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10 13:13 [PATCH v4 00/33] dmaengine: migrate channel tasklets to WQ_BH Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 01/33] dmaengine: add tasklet-backed channel BH helpers Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 02/33] dmaengine: back channel BH helpers with WQ_BH Allen Pais
2026-11-10 14:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 03/33] dmaengine: apple-admac: use dmaengine BH callback Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 04/33] dmaengine: at_xdmac: move irq bottom half to dmaengine BH Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 05/33] dmaengine: ep93xx: hook callbacks via " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 06/33] dmaengine: fsldma: migrate tasklet to " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 07/33] dmaengine: fsl_raid: run completions via " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 08/33] dmaengine: imx-dma: flip per-chan tasklet to " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 09/33] dmaengine: ioat: convert cleanup " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 10/33] dmaengine: mmp_pdma: replace per-chan tasklet with " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 11/33] dmaengine: mmp_tdma: hook completions to " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 12/33] dmaengine: mv_xor: convert irq tasklet " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 13/33] dmaengine: mxs-dma: use dmaengine BH scheduling Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 14/33] dmaengine: nbpfaxi: switch callbacks to dmaengine BH Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 15/33] dmaengine: pch_dma: convert tasklet " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 16/33] dmaengine: ppc4xx: replace irq tasklet with " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 17/33] dmaengine: ste_dma40: convert per-channel tasklet to " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 17:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 18/33] dmaengine: xgene-dma: wire descriptor cleanup " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 19/33] dmaengine: xilinx-dma: use dmaengine BH instead of tasklets Allen Pais
2026-11-10 17:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 20/33] dmaengine: xilinx-dpdma: kill vchan BH on remove Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 21/33] dmaengine: zynqmp-dma: switch completion tasklet to dmaengine BH Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 22/33] dmaengine: tegra20-apb: use channel BH helpers Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 23/33] dmaengine: timb_dma: route callbacks via channel BH Allen Pais
2026-11-10 18:04   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 24/33] dmaengine: txx9dmac: " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 25/33] dmaengine: mv_xor_v2: use channel BH helpers Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 26/33] dmaengine: mpc512x: route callbacks via channel BH Allen Pais
2026-11-10 18:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 27/33] dmaengine: plx_dma: use channel BH helpers Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 28/33] dmaengine: sf-pdma: route error callbacks through channel BH Allen Pais
2026-11-10 19:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 29/33] dmaengine: pl330: route callbacks via " Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 30/33] dmaengine: altera-msgdma: use channel BH helpers Allen Pais
2026-11-11  2:39   ` NG, ADRIAN HO YIN
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 31/33] dmaengine: hidma: defer callbacks via channel BH Allen Pais
2026-11-10 19:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 32/33] dmaengine: qcom-gpi: defer callbacks via vchan Allen Pais
2026-11-10 13:13 ` [PATCH v4 33/33] dmaengine: switchtec: use channel BH helpers Allen Pais

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-207555@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox