From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD1ECCF2D6 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099C64064F; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:36:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtpbgsg1.qq.com (smtpbgsg1.qq.com [54.254.200.92]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB264064A for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:36:33 +0200 (CEST) X-QQ-mid: tivesync6t1792406155t41c8d12b Received: from 0F57A7141CBF4D1588B97A6ED8A17143 (zaiyuwang@trustnetic.com [115.227.112.73]) X-QQ-SSF: 0000000000000000000000000000000 From: =?utf-8?b?WmFpeXUgV2FuZw==?= X-BIZMAIL-ID: 323450369876519352 To: "'Zhang Tengfei'" , "'Jiawen Wu'" , , "'Jiawen Wu'" , Cc: References: <017d01dd5b7c$dedc3a30$9c94ae90$@trustnetic.com> <54095ca6-afe3-4c28-bfce-4456d9e30e4b@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54095ca6-afe3-4c28-bfce-4456d9e30e4b@gmail.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] net/txgbe: fix FDIR Rx packet buffer handling Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:35:54 +0800 Message-ID: <005101dd5fb5$9e9e80d0$dbdb8270$@trustnetic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQIhEhBpsi5gR8a3B/C44cPCswcvpAF2PrlcAff/1f62YdRucA== Content-Language: zh-cn X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: tivesync:trustnetic.com:qybglogicsvrsz:qybglogicsvrsz3b-0 X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MOzJFk6Ub7Xtrgp/o1OhewyGCWl6HY82870z8reYzKduSlxIzK5YM8xZ 3RwUgZv6Xi7h72M3QbPxcCRrq0OLr8tZcheNYqMQv56Uhl881GmOcFEDUQMGqqFlxb1JosI VNaCXFfx8qbHN/XKVZfW6yWF9Fqd1NPrMVyu4bbA/wBuClIBpzRVNbVR59trbvR/qL1eR4y E4Q2ZjNX6qmstCFgxpdDCrUDXRS03+bL4MFiNgivCpxzUM3lKeFmLmMjlrhVT+1cLoWmliB dVKNF/ad9EdxG1Oka/EP/4+9wipiprCy/t2usEUhQmZ1WZEmMDse+5EHX7ww4wFeIpqNkql UsqEPltjvXRgoUgVjzm/NAHiP5F25qOPBEtYL+6ox58Dt8PyvLQ9olXfv4upAMMJQRsfTmg bT2F+7dWyLMYN+C0z8kGlKIkWH13IaiOyMO96z7C/ivl40uQLDF+40eY/V5UW+AMZpvyvMR 3CdhslvxGo1pVsfGu/82mLl8gjhdkhkutije411A78zfiUZeYHLfuO75b/Dmp5HK//3VdHO RLcTNjQHks0UMWmmeTKRieSzRjsbEIbpl0+XtvliSNc91rQ5D/FRVub5CWUBUtkrJpRBCjr eYsWZLOHlpaCEoXQgv96Y0CIne/YvMtyS587Ls1QpmnAATaKL6s6PRRWCT4h59F6b99bw/S eqmL4wCMOsMYo8zuJXeMRpMYEPZ0mwqGctQ3CXIzwuD8rx3Stn1J3FAk0xxrLmCyTz2hF8a 0u0Kp3fgcA9IvgeK+1gZ9UfE4hSYhwESskJARzF7+gXZruqBu2DdhZU0kXYe3e1HSFKsHlP FpqeQcsGiSuz4RwUWdmdgktbCpYPl6pCbVWaZ7fwv40CBMb9dhuHBhVVrQFTV++9dyaZnM7 uuy9kpiyAMKfi5V0j2bSnzXiCChAv6Ig2oPvRjKmKAhoAbp5cxwA3RZg9+E44u92bvifYtI ezhBMkaqJdX2pz7Ry10Da2b1QdKu7FZtqjL4Z6142/xgRFFfK/xA6yUDcwTSTkt8yDlR/LK H5so2g3LxfJ8YGqBt2ze2oTKL+dyGvVwztrtUOdgpsMSHuwstrJ2a6hXBeX2MGoUiSQloni 9uTkHfxZXtOOzB5oE4irGznIIjyDqBBqERasLjfUlaG X-QQ-XMRINFO: NI4Ajvh11aEjEMj13RCX7UuhPEoou2bs1g== X-QQ-RECHKSPAM: 0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org > v2 is out. I do not have a txgbe NIC, so it is compile-tested only. > Would you be able to test it on a txgbe NIC? >=20 > With the port started: create and delete one FDIR rule ten times, then = check that PBRXSIZE(0) (0x19020) does not keep shrinking and that > FDIRCTL (0x19500) is 0 after delete. > flow validate must not change either register. A rule with an = out-of-range queue must fail and leave them unchanged. flow flush must = restore > PBRXSIZE(0). SP and AML if you have both. >=20 Hi Tengfei, Thanks for the series, and for taking the time to fix these in the txgbe = driver. =20 I have tested the v2 series on both SP and AML hardware, and it behaves = as you described No further comments from my side. Thanks again. Acked-by: Zaiyu Wang