From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Allow vectorized Rx with 4096 desc
 ring size on Intel NICs.
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:24:42 +0000
Message-ID: <0110a9dd-d89b-2cc2-a623-4befa3ae95bf@intel.com>
References: <CGME20161019140725eucas1p1cb53318d974fb1152f1a7b571f328fd5@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
 <10330ae4-55fb-7ee0-0263-ad684ad2b931@intel.com>
 <1ed69cc6-4980-fd24-9db5-3ca1b99be70f@samsung.com> <2020651.oVKGRqHCud@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
 Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
 Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>, Heetae Ahn <heetae82.ahn@samsung.com>,
 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE364A63
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  3 Jan 2017 18:24:45 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <2020651.oVKGRqHCud@xps13>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 1/2/2017 3:40 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-12-27 08:03, Ilya Maximets:
>> Hello.
>> Ferruh, Thomas, is there a chance for this to be accepted to 17.02?
>> Maybe I should resend this patch-set without 'RFC' tag?
> 
> Yes it should be integrated in 17.02.
> Ferruh, any news?
> 

I was waiting for a review from driver maintainers

Ilya,

If you don't mind, can you please send again as patches instead of RFC,
if patches also don't get any objection, they can be merged.

Thanks,
ferruh