From: "Ernesto Ruffini" <eruffini@outsys.org>
To: "'Ayshathul Thuhara'" <ayshathul.thuhara@iwave-global.com>
Cc: "'dev'" <dev@dpdk.org>, <yasu1976@gmail.com>, <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: Guidance Required to Improve Throughput on ConnectX-7 (1x400G) with DPDK v23.07
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:09:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03ad01dc9cd0$cd2cfb00$6786f100$@outsys.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PN0P287MB2531BFD1D63007182EFA3E5CC561A@PN0P287MB2531.INDP287.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4133 bytes --]
Hi Ayshathul Thuhara,
l3fwd parameters in the doc are important: they say how many cores/queues to
use.
Try playing with them, adding testpmd specific parameters.
sudo ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd -a 01:00.0 -l
0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 -- -i --rxq=16 --txq=16
--nb-cores=16
Regards,
Ernesto
From: Ayshathul Thuhara <ayshathul.thuhara@iwave-global.com>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2026 10:04
To: Ernesto Ruffini <eruffini@outsys.org>
Cc: 'dev' <dev@dpdk.org>; yasu1976@gmail.com; users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: Guidance Required to Improve Throughput on ConnectX-7 (1x400G)
with DPDK v23.07
Hi Ernesto,
As an additional observation, I tested the setup using iperf3 and was able
to achieve throughput of approximately 92~95 Gbps. However, when running the
DPDK-Testpmd application, the throughput does not reach similar values.
Thanks and regards,
Ayshathul Thuhara
_____
From: Ayshathul Thuhara <ayshathul.thuhara@iwave-global.com
<mailto:ayshathul.thuhara@iwave-global.com> >
Sent: 13 February 2026 14:24
To: Ernesto Ruffini <eruffini@outsys.org <mailto:eruffini@outsys.org> >
Cc: 'dev' <dev@dpdk.org <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> >; yasu1976@gmail.com
<mailto:yasu1976@gmail.com> <yasu1976@gmail.com <mailto:yasu1976@gmail.com>
>; users@dpdk.org <mailto:users@dpdk.org> <users@dpdk.org
<mailto:users@dpdk.org> >
Subject: Re: Guidance Required to Improve Throughput on ConnectX-7 (1x400G)
with DPDK v23.07
Hi Ernesto,
Thankyou for the suggestion.
I will look into
"https://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_23_11_NVIDIA_NIC_performance_report.pdf
" , but here the tests uses external device for traffic generator.
Yes, with ethtool it shows 400Gbps.
The module can support upto 100Gbps. But it should have increased more than
10Gbps. I will disable AN and check once.
Thanks and regards,
Ayshathul Thuhara
_____
From: Ernesto Ruffini <eruffini@outsys.org <mailto:eruffini@outsys.org> >
Sent: 13 February 2026 14:19
To: Ayshathul Thuhara <ayshathul.thuhara@iwave-global.com
<mailto:ayshathul.thuhara@iwave-global.com> >; users@dpdk.org
<mailto:users@dpdk.org> <users@dpdk.org <mailto:users@dpdk.org> >
Cc: 'dev' <dev@dpdk.org <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> >; yasu1976@gmail.com
<mailto:yasu1976@gmail.com> <yasu1976@gmail.com <mailto:yasu1976@gmail.com>
>
Subject: RE: Guidance Required to Improve Throughput on ConnectX-7 (1x400G)
with DPDK v23.07
Hi Ayshathul,
I think the best is to follow
https://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_23_11_NVIDIA_NIC_performance_report.pdf
Did you check with ethtool or similar the actual connection speed? ethtool
linux-nic-name | grep Speed
Maybe your module limits it to 10Gbps. In case try to disable
auto-negotiation
Regards,
Ernesto
From: Ayshathul Thuhara <ayshathul.thuhara@iwave-global.com
<mailto:ayshathul.thuhara@iwave-global.com> >
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2026 07:36
To: users@dpdk.org <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> >; yasu1976@gmail.com
<mailto:yasu1976@gmail.com>
Subject: Guidance Required to Improve Throughput on ConnectX-7 (1x400G) with
DPDK v23.07
Dear Team,
I hope this message finds you well.
I am currently performing testing on ConnectX-7 with 1x400G hardware using
DPDK v23.07. However, I am unable to achieve data transfer rates beyond 10
Gbps. While reviewing the DPDK mailing list, I came across your previous
responses in the related discussion
(https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/2024-July/007767.html), where you
mentioned achieving throughput of around 250 Gbps and above.
Could you kindly advise on the configuration changes or optimizations
required to improve throughput in this setup?
For reference, I am using an OSFP loopback module for testing, where the
same port is used for both transmission and reception (single-port loopback
setup).
CX-7 Firmware: 28.45.1200
CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-14700
Command used : sudo ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd -a 01:00.0 -- -i
I would greatly appreciate your guidance.
Thank you in advance, and I look forward to your response.
Thanks and regards,
Ayshathul Thuhara
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 14007 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-13 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-13 6:35 Guidance Required to Improve Throughput on ConnectX-7 (1x400G) with DPDK v23.07 Ayshathul Thuhara
2026-02-13 8:49 ` Ernesto Ruffini
2026-02-13 8:54 ` Ayshathul Thuhara
2026-02-13 9:04 ` Ayshathul Thuhara
2026-02-13 10:09 ` Ernesto Ruffini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='03ad01dc9cd0$cd2cfb00$6786f100$@outsys.org' \
--to=eruffini@outsys.org \
--cc=ayshathul.thuhara@iwave-global.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
--cc=yasu1976@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox