dev.dpdk.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lhffjzh" <lhffjzh-KN7UnAbNpbg@public.gmane.org>
To: "'Thomas Monjalon'"
	<thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org,
	maintainers-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 09:47:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <046801d052f8$9090a530$b1b1ef90$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1566601.Xkl8jJDb44@xps13>

Hi Thomas,

Thanks very much for your reminder, you give me many help in this mail list.

The issue with detailed information just as below. but I don't know 
who is the dpdk i40e maintainers? is maintainers-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?

Hardware list:
    2 i40e 40G NICs
    Xeon E5-2670 v2(10 cores)
    32G memory

I loopback 2 i40e NICs by QSFP cable, one NIC send UDP network packet by
DPDK,
and another for receiving. I bind 4 processor's logical cores with 4 rx
queue
"0,1,2,3" on receiving NIC, when I start to send packet, only rx queue "0"
can receive
the UDP packet, the others queue always receive nothing. but it is work well
on ixgbe 
10G NICs, I can receive network packet from all rx queues. does anyone
kindly know why?


Regards,
Haifeng

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:55 PM
To: lhffjzh
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC

2015-02-27 16:47, lhffjzh:
> Hi All,
> 
> We use 4 cores loop 4 rx queues on one i40e port, but only rx queue "0"
can
> receive network packet, do anyone kindly know why? BTW, all of network
> packet has same destination ip address but has more than 200 different
> source ip address.

It's possible that you don't have any answer for 2 reasons:
- you replied in a thread dedicated to Cisco enic questions
- you didn't describe your usage enough to understand your problem

I suggest to use the button "new email" instead of "reply all" to
start a new question with enough details.

Did you noticed you put some Cisco guys in CC instead of putting the
Intel responsible for i40e (see MAINTAINERS file)?

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-28  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-25 17:26 [PATCH v6 0/6] enicpmd: Cisco Systems Inc. VIC Ethernet PMD Sujith Sankar
     [not found] ` <1416936405-25333-1-git-send-email-ssujith-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-25 17:26   ` [PATCH v6 1/6] enicpmd: License text Sujith Sankar
2014-11-25 17:26   ` [PATCH v6 2/6] enicpmd: Makefile Sujith Sankar
2014-11-25 17:26   ` [PATCH v6 3/6] enicpmd: VNIC common code partially shared with ENIC kernel mode driver Sujith Sankar
2014-11-25 17:26   ` [PATCH v6 4/6] enicpmd: pmd specific code Sujith Sankar
     [not found]     ` <1416936405-25333-5-git-send-email-ssujith-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-27 14:49       ` Wodkowski, PawelX
2014-11-25 17:26   ` [PATCH v6 5/6] enicpmd: DPDK-ENIC PMD interface Sujith Sankar
     [not found]     ` <1416936405-25333-6-git-send-email-ssujith-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-29  8:15       ` Wu, Jingjing
     [not found]         ` <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8B6647D-0J0gbvR4kTg/UvCtAeCM4rfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-30  4:45           ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
     [not found]             ` <D0C82A9E.2BA5D%ssujith-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-06  9:41               ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-30  8:53               ` Wu, Jingjing
2014-11-25 17:26   ` [PATCH v6 6/6] enicpmd: DPDK changes for accommodating ENIC PMD Sujith Sankar
2014-11-25 19:51   ` [PATCH v6 0/6] enicpmd: Cisco Systems Inc. VIC Ethernet PMD David Marchand
     [not found]     ` <CALwxeUuHA7snfB6wfRXH5fGghGF_b1Sgje=j5Pr_kD9nm7kpyw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-26 22:11       ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-27  4:27         ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
     [not found]           ` <D09CA4CB.28E71%ssujith-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-27 15:31             ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-20 11:25               ` David Marchand
     [not found]                 ` <CALwxeUtn7N0q+_21JnUqsQ4NtxgtH_HsK7iDL117Yef9n+m_tw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-21  5:03                   ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
     [not found]                     ` <D0E53052.2D122%ssujith-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-26 11:49                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-02-26 13:08                         ` Wiles, Keith
     [not found]                           ` <D1147695.1518B%keith.wiles-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-27  8:09                             ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
     [not found]                               ` <D1162370.313E9%ssujith-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-27  8:47                                 ` Why only rx queue "0" can receive network packet by i40e NIC lhffjzh
2015-02-27  9:03                                   ` lhffjzh
2015-02-27 10:55                                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-02-28  1:47                                     ` lhffjzh [this message]
2015-02-28  3:17                                       ` Zhang, Helin
     [not found]                                         ` <F35DEAC7BCE34641BA9FAC6BCA4A12E70A80D82C-0J0gbvR4kTg/UvCtAeCM4rfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-28  4:33                                           ` lhffjzh
2015-02-28 14:33                                             ` Zhang, Helin
2015-07-23  0:47                                               ` Jeff Venable, Sr.
2015-07-23  0:56                                                 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-07-30  1:58                                                   ` Jeff Venable, Sr.
2015-07-31 15:35                                                     ` Zhang, Helin
2015-02-27 10:46                                 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] enicpmd: Cisco Systems Inc. VIC Ethernet PMD Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-11  9:05                                   ` Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
2015-05-11  9:25                               ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-25 20:11   ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='046801d052f8$9090a530$b1b1ef90$@com' \
    --to=lhffjzh-kn7unabnpbg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=maintainers-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).