From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] Wind River Systems AVP PMD
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:54:33 +0100
Message-ID: <06f382a8-b177-fc58-945e-eab6f23639b0@6wind.com>
References: <1487985795-136044-1-git-send-email-allain.legacy@windriver.com>
 <1488136143-116389-1-git-send-email-allain.legacy@windriver.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org,
 "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Allain Legacy <allain.legacy@windriver.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com (mail-wr0-f169.google.com
 [209.85.128.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2762B88
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:54:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id l37so3248049wrc.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:54:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1488136143-116389-1-git-send-email-allain.legacy@windriver.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Le 26/02/2017 à 20:08, Allain Legacy a écrit :
> This patch series submits an initial version of the AVP PMD from Wind River
> Systems.  The series includes shared header files, driver implementation,
> and changes to documentation files in support of this new driver.  The AVP
> driver is a shared memory based device.  It is intended to be used as a PMD
> within a virtual machine running on a Wind River virtualization platform.
> See: http://www.windriver.com/products/titanium-cloud/

Allain,

I think it needs more information and performance details about this AVP 
vs virtio. I understand from your link that Titanium is a Qemu/Linux 
based solution, so virtio could be used, correct?

So, before spending too much time in reviewing your long serie, I think 
that proper statements are needed. In the past, other NICs using Qemu 
have been sent, but they were avoided since virtio solved all the issues.

Thank you,
   Vincent