From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" Subject: Re: [Bug 60] rte_event_port_unlink() causes subsequent events to end up in wrong port Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:20:46 +0000 Message-ID: <07BE072F-4E3F-439A-9C7B-BB7349B19D9F@nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: "jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com" Return-path: Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db5eur01on0111.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.2.111]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2250014E8 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:20:48 +0200 (CEST) Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <58DBE325D83E4B4A89D24E06A0EA55CD@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > No related to this question, Are you planning to use rte_event_port_unlin= k() in fastpath? > Does rte_event_stop() works for you, if it is in slow path. Hi Jerin, Sorry for missing your question earlier. We need rte_event_port_link() / rte_event_port_unlink() for doing load balancing, so calling rte_event_stop= () isn't an option. -Matias