From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] ethdev: add mark flow item to rte_flow_item_types Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 13:24:48 +0100 Message-ID: <08a47c8d-c534-43a8-ed29-77ffd6cb52d1@intel.com> References: <20180426120817.6612-1-declan.doherty@intel.com> <20180426172919.8450-1-declan.doherty@intel.com> <20180426172919.8450-4-declan.doherty@intel.com> <4180955.xhS42tmOuU@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon , Declan Doherty Return-path: Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57901727F for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:24:52 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <4180955.xhS42tmOuU@xps> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 4/26/2018 7:52 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 26/04/2018 19:29, Declan Doherty: >> Introduces a new action type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_MARK which enables >> flow patterns to specify arbitrary integer values to match aginst >> set by the RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK action in previously matched >> flows. > > In the title, I don't think you need specify rte_flow_item_types > (which doesn't exist BTW). > I suggest: > ethdev: add mark flow item Updated on next-net.