From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] net/bnxt: fix some link related issues Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:55:52 +0100 Message-ID: <096daf46-dd9f-f84b-de0d-9a4e87a8d461@intel.com> References: <20170629025142.19404-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> <20170629025142.19404-7-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Stephen Hurd To: Ajit Khaparde , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61432C2A for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:55:54 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20170629025142.19404-7-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 6/29/2017 3:51 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote: > This patch fixes some link related issues that can occur because: > > bnxt_hwrm_port_phy_cfg() was setting enables inappropriately. > bnxt_hwrm_port_phy_qcfg() was overly complex. > bnxt_get_hwrm_link_config() was basing the speed on the link status. > bnxt_get_hwrm_link_config() was using the incorrect macros for auto_mode > we are not using supported speeds from phy_qcfg for auto mask. Does it make sense to split patch per issue fixed? > > Fixes: 7bc8e9a227cc ("net/bnxt: support async link notification") > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hurd > Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <...>