From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/nfp: add CPP bridge as service Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:54:45 +0000 Message-ID: <09fd5132-905b-bbe0-1178-392595027353@intel.com> References: <20190103085621.23611-1-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Alejandro Lucero , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085491B3BB for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 11:54:47 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20190103085621.23611-1-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/3/2019 8:56 AM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > The Netronome's Network Flow Processor chip is highly programmable > with the goal of processing packets at high speed. Processing units > and other chip components are available from the host through the > PCIe CPP(Command Push Pull bus) interface. The NFP PF PMD configures > a CPP handler for setting up and working with vNICs, perform actions > like link up or down, or accessing extended stats from the MAC component. > > There exist NFP host tools which access the NFP components for > programming and debugging but they require the CPP interface. When the > PMD is bound to the PF, the DPDK app owns the CPP interface, so these > host tools can not access the NFP through other means like NFP kernel > drivers. > > This patch adds a CPP bridge using the rte_service API which can be > enabled by a DPDK app. Interestingly, DPDK clients like OVS will not > enable specific service cores, but this can be performed with a > secondary process specifically enabling this CPP bridge service and > therefore giving access to the NFP to those host tools. Hi Alejandro, Getting a few build errors, more details below. > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <...> > + /* Obtain target's CPP ID and offset in target */ > + cpp_id = (offset >> 40) << 8; With icc, i686 getting [1], it seems 'off_t' is 32bits long on 32bit build. [1] error #63: shift count is too large <...> > + if (err != (int)len) { > + printf("%s: error when receiving, %d of %lu\n", > + __func__, err, count); Giving build error for 32bits [3], and can you please use logging macros instead of printf? [3] error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘size_t’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} [-Werror=format=] <...> > + /* Obtain target's CPP ID and offset in target */ > + cpp_id = (offset >> 40) << 8; Same as above [1]. <...> > + if (err != (int)len) { > + printf("%s: error when sending: %d of %lu\n", > + __func__, err, count); Same build error with above [3]. <...> > +nfp_cpp_bridge_serve_ioctl(int sockfd, struct nfp_cpp *cpp) > +{ > + int cmd, err; > + uint32_t ident_size, tmp; > + > + /* Reading now the IOCTL command */ > + err = recv(sockfd, &cmd, 4, 0); > + if (err != 4) { > + printf("%s: read error from socket\n", __func__); > + return -EIO; > + } > + > + /* Only supporting NFP_IOCTL_CPP_IDENTIFICATION */ > + if (cmd != NFP_IOCTL_CPP_IDENTIFICATION) { Giving build error with ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc [2]. [2] error: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]