Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] VRF support in FIB library

["Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>]

Hi Robin,

On 3/23/2026 9:54 AM, Robin Jarry wrote:
> Vladimir Medvedkin, Mar 22, 2026 at 16:42:
>> This series adds multi-VRF support to both IPv4 and IPv6 FIB paths by
>> allowing a single FIB instance to host multiple isolated routing domains.
>>
>> Currently FIB instance represents one routing instance. For workloads that
>> need multiple VRFs, the only option is to create multiple FIB objects. In a
>> burst oriented datapath, packets in the same batch can belong to different VRFs, so
>> the application either does per-packet lookup in different FIB instances or
>> regroups packets by VRF before lookup. Both approaches are expensive.
>>
>> To remove that cost, this series keeps all VRFs inside one FIB instance and
>> extends lookup input with per-packet VRF IDs.
>>
>> The design follows the existing fast-path structure for both families. IPv4 and
>> IPv6 use multi-ary trees with a 2^24 associativity on a first level (tbl24). The
>> first-level table scales per configured VRF. This increases memory usage, but
>> keeps performance and lookup complexity on par with non-VRF implementation.
>>
>> Vladimir Medvedkin (4):
>>    fib: add multi-VRF support
>>    fib: add VRF functional and unit tests
>>    fib6: add multi-VRF support
>>    fib6: add VRF functional and unit tests
> Hey Vladimir,
>
> Thanks for the series, this is an interesting approach. Does this allow
> sharing the tbl8 arrays amongst VRFs?

Yes! tbl8 array is shared for all VRFs in both IPv4(dir24_8) and IPv6(trie).

-- 
Regards,
Vladimir