From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] fix compilation with -Og Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 01:26:17 +0100 Message-ID: <0def7ae9-ad8e-1df8-18cd-ee4e9515d621@intel.com> References: <20170911151333.5727-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Olivier Matz , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAE21B1EB for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 02:26:20 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20170911151333.5727-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 9/11/2017 4:13 PM, Olivier Matz wrote: > In developer mode (RTE_DEVEL_BUILD=y) where -Werror is passed in the > CFLAGS, the compilation fails with gcc-6.3.0 and EXTRA_CFLAGS=-Og. Some > errors are real bugs (but not critical), while some are false positives > (gcc bugs?). > > The solution often consists in initializing a local variable to > ensure the compiler won't complain. > > The patchset contains all the fixes needed to properly compile with -Og. > Feedback is welcome to decide if: > 1/ we include all of them, even if some are workarounds for > gcc bugs > 2/ we only include the real fixes, without fixing the compilation with > -Og. > > > Olivier Matz (10): > net/bnxt: fix compilation with -Og > net/qede: fix compilation with -Og > net/virtio: fix compilation with -Og > net/i40e: fix compilation with -Og > uio: fix compilation with -Og > cmdline: fix compilation with -Og > metrics: fix compilation with -Og > lpm6: fix compilation with -Og > app/test-crypto-perf: fix memory leak > app/test-crypto-perf: fix compilation with -Og Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. Except 3/10, 4/10, 8/10. Normally we don't get partial sets, that makes life harder for everyone, but since mentioned ones requires some more input I didn't want to make rest wait. When those three concluded would you mind sending another set for them?