From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manoj Mallawaarachchi Subject: Re: [RFC] proposal of allowing personal/project repos on DPDK.org Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1085704550.1206846.1496479255188@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1085704550.1206846.1496479255188.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Reply-To: Manoj Mallawaarachchi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , BruceRichardson , "yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com" , KonstantinAnanyev To: Thomas Monjalon , TiweiBie , CristianDumitrescu Return-path: Received: from sonic325-23.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic325-23.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.67.149]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF96B7CE3 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 10:40:56 +0200 (CEST) List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Dear All, Hope github is best place as many people do. -------------------------------------------- On Fri, 6/2/17, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] proposal of allowing personal/project repos= =09on=09DPDK.org To: "Thomas Monjalon" , "Bie, Tiwei" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com" , "An= anyev, Konstantin" Date: Friday, June 2, 2017, 10:37 PM =20 > Why? Do you need to host a repo on dpdk.org to try a new idea? >=20 =20 Prototyping new DPDK-related ideas and sharing them with DPDK community, with some of them likely to eventually make their way into DPDK once accepted and mature enough. =20 =20 > I am against adding some user repos in this list: > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 http://dpdk.org/browse/ > I think the list of official repos must be kept light for good visibility. =20 We could have a single project called sandbox mentioned in this list; whoever interested, needs to drill down into this one? =20 >=20 > But we can imagine a forge for users at a different location like > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 http://dpdk.org/users/ > However why not using another public forge for this need? =20 Easier to share DPDK related ideas on dpdk.org rather than other places. =20 =20