From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: DPDK hash function related question Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:40:51 +0200 Message-ID: <10949795.PKElVBY67L@xps13> References: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D89126478D64A1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Bly, Mike" To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D688DAB for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:41:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so193593239wic.0 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D89126478D64A1@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-09-22 10:05, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > Are you using a DPDK release older than 2.1? > In DPDK we moved away from test_hash to CRC-based hashes. > Please take a look at DPDK release 2.1 examples/ip_pipeline application: > in pipeline_flow_classification_be.c, we use CRC-based hash functions > defined in file hash_func.h from the same folder. Has it already been said that these functions should be hosted elsewhere? e.g in librte_hash ;)