From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] default to using all cores if no -c, -l, or --lcores options given Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:47:18 +0100 Message-ID: <10965028.2hF1gvA4H4@xps13> References: <1443213436-113824-1-git-send-email-rlane@bigswitch.com> <6437409.HojkCX2fBM@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Rich Lane Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49918D8D for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:48:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so130110050wic.0 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:48:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6437409.HojkCX2fBM@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-26 15:17, Thomas Monjalon: > There was no comment for this new behaviour. > It means everybody agree to default to all cores. > > 2015-09-25 13:37, Rich Lane: > > This is a useful default for simple applications where the assignment of lcores > > to CPUs doesn't matter. It's also useful for more complex applications that > > automatically assign tasks to cores based on the NUMA topology. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rich Lane Applied, thanks The documentation about the command line options must be updated and simplified.