From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 for 2.3] vhost rxtx refactor Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:50:22 +0100 Message-ID: <111992201.GYQ3cgQmjX@xps13> References: <1449122773-25510-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Victor Kaplansky , "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Yuanhan Liu Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8463FC322 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:51:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id a4so418528wme.1 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:51:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1449122773-25510-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Yuanhan, 2015-12-03 14:06, Yuanhan Liu: > Vhost rxtx code is derived from vhost-switch example, which is very > likely the most messy code in DPDK. Unluckily, the move also brings > over the bad merits: twisted logic, bad comments. > > When I joined this team firstly, I was quite scared off by the messy > and long vhost rxtx code. While adding the vhost-user live migration > support, that I have to make fews changes to it, I then ventured to > look at it again, to understand it better, in the meantime, to see if > I can refactor it. > > And, here you go. There were several comments and a typo detected. Please what is the status of this patchset?