From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: stop and deactivate slaves when bonding port is stopped Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 23:55:45 +0200 Message-ID: <11360076.HoYMhSRcrZ@xps> References: <1533129523-1407-1-git-send-email-radu.nicolau@intel.com> <0c16cb66-6ee4-ff2d-6d16-7a3fdd021b0c@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Doherty, Declan" , Radu Nicolau , stable@dpdk.org To: chas3@att.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <0c16cb66-6ee4-ff2d-6d16-7a3fdd021b0c@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 02/08/2018 15:38, Doherty, Declan: > On 01/08/2018 2:18 PM, Radu Nicolau wrote: > > When a bonding port is stopped also stop and deactivate all slaves. > > Otherwise slaves will be still listed as active. > > > > Fixes: 69bce062132b ("net/bonding: do not clear active slave count") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau > > Acked-by: Declan Doherty Waiting for opinion from the other bonding maintainer (Chas) who started to review and has some doubts. Chas, please do you agree with Declan's ack?