From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] eal/pci: generalize args of PCI
 scan/match towards RTE device/driver
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:33:56 +0530
Message-ID: <12001366-5c91-5b89-e9c5-e85236f7de78@nxp.com>
References: <1482756644-13726-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <1482758645-23057-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <1482758645-23057-9-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
 <32257536.1rHviD2EUb@xps13>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <david.marchand@6wind.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-sn1nam01on0071.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.71])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779232C36
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:00:28 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <32257536.1rHviD2EUb@xps13>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wednesday 04 January 2017 03:43 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-12-26 18:54, Shreyansh Jain:
>> PCI scan and match now work on rte_device/rte_driver rather than PCI
>> specific objects. These functions can now be plugged to the generic
>> bus callbacks for scanning and matching devices/drivers.
>
> These sentences looks weird :)
> PCI functions must work with PCI objects, it's simpler.
> However I agree to register PCI scan, match, init and remove functions
> with the generic rte_bus. Then the rte_device object is casted into
> rte_pci_device inside these functions.
>

Ok. I will rephrase.