From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 02:46:41 +0200
Message-ID: <1398818805-18834-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>

The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK
for RPM-based distributions.

The file naming currently doesn't allow to install different DPDK versions.
But the packaging naming should be ready to manage different DPDK versions
having different API/ABI for different applications:
	- dpdk-core has full version in its name to manage API breaking
	- extensions have a number as name suffix to manage PMD API breaking.
When API/ABI will be stable, package names could be simpler.

I suggest to add these .spec files as a starting point for integration
in Linux distributions.

Changes since v1:
	- name of .spec file match package name
	- version in package name
	- no static library
	- ldconfig/depmod in scriplets

Thanks for your comments/reviews.
-- 
Thomas