From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Marchand Subject: [PATCH RFC] eal: remove useless output Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:14:53 +0200 Message-ID: <1398867293-18406-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Return-path: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" From: Didier Pallard Increasing maximum number of lcores gives a huge place to undetected lcores in output traces. Moreover, this output does not give any interesting information, since list of undetected lcores can be deduced from list of detected ones. So remove output related to undetected cores. Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard --- lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_lcore.c | 1 - lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_lcore.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_lcore.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_lcore.c index e2f3793..81b5f13 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_lcore.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_lcore.c @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ rte_eal_cpu_init(void) lcore_config[lcore_id].detected = (lcore_id < ncpus); if (lcore_config[lcore_id].detected == 0) { - RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Skip lcore %u (not detected)\n", lcore_id); config->lcore_role[lcore_id] = ROLE_OFF; continue; } diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_lcore.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_lcore.c index d310d85..03f4ba3 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_lcore.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_lcore.c @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ rte_eal_cpu_init(void) for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++) { lcore_config[lcore_id].detected = cpu_detected(lcore_id); if (lcore_config[lcore_id].detected == 0) { - RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Skip lcore %u (not detected)\n", lcore_id); config->lcore_role[lcore_id] = ROLE_OFF; continue; } -- 1.7.10.4