From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Marchand Subject: [PATCH 02/10] pci: use lookup tailq api Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 22:50:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1425505810-9269-3-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> References: <1425505810-9269-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1425505810-9269-1-git-send-email-david.marchand-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" There is no reason why we should use the "reserve" tailq api, since the pci entry is already statically reserved. Signed-off-by: David Marchand --- lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 2 +- lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c index e692b35..4d2fbbb 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ rte_eal_pci_init(void) { TAILQ_INIT(&pci_driver_list); TAILQ_INIT(&pci_device_list); - uio_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_RESERVE_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI, uio_res_list); + uio_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_LOOKUP_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI, uio_res_list); /* for debug purposes, PCI can be disabled */ if (internal_config.no_pci) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c index 6d4932d..8f44f09 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c @@ -766,8 +766,8 @@ rte_eal_pci_init(void) { TAILQ_INIT(&pci_driver_list); TAILQ_INIT(&pci_device_list); - pci_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_RESERVE_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI, - mapped_pci_res_list); + pci_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_LOOKUP_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI, + mapped_pci_res_list); /* for debug purposes, PCI can be disabled */ if (internal_config.no_pci) -- 1.7.10.4