From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Adjust mbuf flag definitions Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:50:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1467636.AzLFRR9WOp@xps13> References: <1412350612-23190-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1412350612-23190-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 2014-10-03 16:36, Bruce Richardson: > This patchset does some cleanup work on the mbuf flag definitions. It is > based off the ideas discussed in the previous RFC patch. > [Ref: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/6155] > > Summary of changes: > * Adjust TX flags to start at bit 55 in flags field and work downwards, > leaving bits 56 upward reserved for generic mbuf flags, i.e. non-offload > flags. > * Update the existing RX flags to be in a similar format to the newly > redefined TX flags for clarity. > * Finally we add a comment for the ctrl mbuf flag to ensure all flags are > properly documented. > > Bruce Richardson (3): > mbuf: move TX flags to group them near end of field > mbuf: RX flag format update > mbuf: add comment for ctrl mbuf flag Acked and applied Thanks -- Thomas