From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shreyansh Jain Subject: [PATCH] doc: grammatical fix in EAL docs Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:58:26 +0530 Message-ID: <1468315706-1468-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: , To: Return-path: Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02on0084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.84]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DFA370 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:27:55 +0200 (CEST) List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain --- doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst index 4b9895e..10a10a8 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ Known Issues be preempted by another pthread doing a multi-consumer dequeue on the same ring. - Bypassing this constraint it may cause the 2nd pthread to spin until the 1st one is scheduled again. + Bypassing this constraint may cause the 2nd pthread to spin until the 1st one is scheduled again. Moreover, if the 1st pthread is preempted by a context that has an higher priority, it may even cause a dead lock. This does not mean it cannot be used, simply, there is a need to narrow down the situation when it is used by multi-pthread on the same core. -- 2.7.4