From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] cryptodev_start fixes Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:44:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1469180663-24259-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> References: <1469098444-2156-2-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Akhil Goyal , Hemant Agrawal , declan.doherty@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB9D47D1 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:44:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id q128so50400570wma.1 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 02:44:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1469098444-2156-2-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" It seems cryptodev_start() calls empty driver functions, and is not called in the example applications. This a v2 of patches from Hemant Agrawal and Akhil Goyal. There are some improvements to make error messages more consistent with existing ones and keep the existing error return. Are they important fixes for 16.07? Please advise. Hemant Agrawal (2): examples/l2fwd-crypto: call start function examples/ipsec-secgw: call start function examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec-secgw.c | 4 ++++ examples/l2fwd-crypto/main.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) -- 2.7.0