From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kni: replace strict_strtoul with kstrtoul Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:18:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1474820.EkRfEgf9QI@xps13> References: <1418182383-5744-1-git-send-email-jmiao@redhat.com> <1663200.Cog0FQ0fDE@xps13> <957926828.25865702.1418201305408.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Jincheng Miao Return-path: In-Reply-To: <957926828.25865702.1418201305408.JavaMail.zimbra-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 2014-12-10 03:48, Jincheng Miao: > > It seems you forgot to include the new compat.h. > > > > Did you do some tests with different Fedora/RHEL versions? > > Yes, missing compat.h in kni_vhost.c. > > > And, I want to get your opinion about adding compat.h to kni and xen_dom0. > The pros: easy to implement and minimal wrapper for older kernel. Yes I think it's the good approach. > The cons: there is so many compat.h, and the file kcompat.h also makes user confuse. Why kcompat makes user confuse? Do you think you could send a new version quickly to integrate it in the next RC (probably today)? Please test it with RHEL. Thanks -- Thomas