From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shreyansh Jain Subject: [PATCH v7 18/21] ether: verify we copy info from a PCI device Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:56:35 +0530 Message-ID: <1477657598-826-19-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> References: <1477581467-12588-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> <1477657598-826-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Shreyansh Jain , thomas.monjalon@6wind.com, viktorin@rehivetech.com To: Return-path: Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01on0059.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.59]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163E1BB20 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:31:15 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1477657598-826-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" From: Jan Viktorin Now that different types of ethdev exist, check for presence of PCI dev while copying out the info. Similar would be done for SoC. Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal --- lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c index 347c230..a1e3aaf 100644 --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c @@ -3206,6 +3206,8 @@ rte_eth_copy_pci_info(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, struct rte_pci_device *pci_de return; } + RTE_VERIFY(eth_dev->pci_dev != NULL); + eth_dev->data->dev_flags = 0; if (pci_dev->driver->drv_flags & RTE_PCI_DRV_INTR_LSC) eth_dev->data->dev_flags |= RTE_ETH_DEV_INTR_LSC; -- 2.7.4