From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Zhao Subject: [PATCH v3] mempool: remove a redundant word "for" in comment Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:40:00 +0800 Message-ID: <1480909200-34647-1-git-send-email-wei.zhao1@intel.com> Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, Wei Zhao To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EDCFA3B for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 04:43:40 +0100 (CET) List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" There is a redundant repetition word "for" in commnet line of the file rte_mempool.h after the definition of RTE_MEMPOOL_OPS_NAMESIZE. The word "for"appear twice in line 359 and 360. One of them is redundant, so delete it. Fixes: 449c49b93a6b ("mempool: support handler operations") Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao Acked-by: John McNamara Acked-by: Olivier Matz --- v3: --checkpatch warnings fixed v2: --checkpatch errors fixed --- lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h index 440f3b1..911102b 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ void rte_mempool_check_cookies(const struct rte_mempool *mp, * Prototype for implementation specific data provisioning function. * * The function should provide the implementation specific memory for - * for use by the other mempool ops functions in a given mempool ops struct. + * use by the other mempool ops functions in a given mempool ops struct. * E.g. the default ops provides an instance of the rte_ring for this purpose. * it will most likely point to a different type of data structure, and * will be transparent to the application programmer. -- 2.5.5