From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jianbo Liu Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] net/ixgbe: calculate correct number of received packets for ARM NEON-version vPMD Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:05:26 +0800 Message-ID: <1486613126-30409-2-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> References: <1482127758-4904-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <1486613126-30409-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> Cc: Jianbo Liu To: dev@dpdk.org, helin.zhang@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3172BAA for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 05:05:41 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1486613126-30409-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" vPMD will check 4 descs in one time, but the statuses are not consistent because the memory allocated for RX descriptors is cacheable huagepage. This patch is to calculate the number of received packets by scann DD bit sequentially, and stops when meeting the first packet with DD bit unset. Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu --- drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_neon.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_neon.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_neon.c index f96cc85..e2715cb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_neon.c +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_neon.c @@ -196,7 +196,6 @@ struct ixgbe_rx_entry *sw_ring; uint16_t nb_pkts_recd; int pos; - uint64_t var; uint8x16_t shuf_msk = { 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, /* skip 32 bits pkt_type */ @@ -255,26 +254,24 @@ uint64x2_t mbp1, mbp2; uint8x16_t staterr; uint16x8_t tmp; + uint32_t var = 0; uint32_t stat; /* B.1 load 1 mbuf point */ mbp1 = vld1q_u64((uint64_t *)&sw_ring[pos]); - /* Read desc statuses backwards to avoid race condition */ - /* A.1 load 4 pkts desc */ - descs[3] = vld1q_u64((uint64_t *)(rxdp + 3)); - rte_rmb(); - /* B.2 copy 2 mbuf point into rx_pkts */ vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rx_pkts[pos], mbp1); /* B.1 load 1 mbuf point */ mbp2 = vld1q_u64((uint64_t *)&sw_ring[pos + 2]); - descs[2] = vld1q_u64((uint64_t *)(rxdp + 2)); - /* B.1 load 2 mbuf point */ - descs[1] = vld1q_u64((uint64_t *)(rxdp + 1)); + /* A. load 4 pkts descs */ descs[0] = vld1q_u64((uint64_t *)(rxdp)); + descs[1] = vld1q_u64((uint64_t *)(rxdp + 1)); + descs[2] = vld1q_u64((uint64_t *)(rxdp + 2)); + descs[3] = vld1q_u64((uint64_t *)(rxdp + 3)); + rte_smp_rmb(); /* B.2 copy 2 mbuf point into rx_pkts */ vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rx_pkts[pos + 2], mbp2); @@ -349,11 +346,19 @@ vst1q_u8((uint8_t *)&rx_pkts[pos]->rx_descriptor_fields1, pkt_mb1); + stat &= IXGBE_VPMD_DESC_DD_MASK; + /* C.4 calc avaialbe number of desc */ - var = __builtin_popcount(stat & IXGBE_VPMD_DESC_DD_MASK); - nb_pkts_recd += var; - if (likely(var != RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP)) + if (likely(stat != IXGBE_VPMD_DESC_DD_MASK)) { + while (stat & 0x01) { + ++var; + stat = stat >> 8; + } + nb_pkts_recd += var; break; + } else { + nb_pkts_recd += RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP; + } } /* Update our internal tail pointer */ -- 1.8.3.1