From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/bond: change link status check to no-wait Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:53:45 -0400 Message-ID: <1498510425.1841.0.camel@gmail.com> References: <20170626151347.16680-1-declan.doherty@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Declan Doherty , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com (mail-qk0-f193.google.com [209.85.220.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13991374 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 22:53:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk0-f193.google.com with SMTP id p21so1665556qke.0 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:53:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170626151347.16680-1-declan.doherty@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 16:13 +0100, Declan Doherty wrote: > In the 802.3ad periodic callback function the link status of all slaves > is checked using rte_eth_link_get function. Depending on the slave > device this function can block for up to 9 seconds and therefore > could cause issues with the LACP Daemon state machine and control > patches handling. This patch changes to the no-wait version of > the link get function. > > Fixes: 46fb4368 ("bond:add mode 4") > > Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty > --- > drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c > index d2b7592..3a97336 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c > @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ bond_mode_8023ad_periodic_cb(void *arg) > uint16_t key; > > slave_id = internals->active_slaves[i]; > - rte_eth_link_get(slave_id, &link_info); > + rte_eth_link_get_nowait(slave_id, &link_info); > rte_eth_macaddr_get(slave_id, &slave_addr); > > if (link_info.link_status != 0) { It seems like this should be done in bandwidth_left() as well.