From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Sort list of entries in examples.dox
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 17:12:09 +0100
Message-ID: <1507565529.14973.1.camel@debian.org>
References: <20171009132058.8915-1-bwiedemann@suse.de>
 <20171009132411.8992-1-bwiedemann@suse.de>
 <1507557080.28033.10.camel@debian.org>
 <9687ec77-a8ea-1d22-bb00-94b30dc23c28@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: "Bernhard M. Wiedemann" <bwiedemann@suse.de>, dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com (mail-wm0-f66.google.com [74.125.82.66])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CFB1B202
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  9 Oct 2017 18:12:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id q124so24033454wmb.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9687ec77-a8ea-1d22-bb00-94b30dc23c28@suse.de>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 16:36 +0200, Bernhard M. Wiedemann wrote:
> On 2017-10-09 15:51, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > If you are interested in reproducible builds please have a look at
> > this
> > patch series I submitted a while ago:
> >=20
> > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28386/
> >=20
> > I have verified that those patches make the build reproducible on
> > Debian (x86/x86_64/arm64).
> >=20
> > Feedback from SUSE is very welcome!
>=20
> I am very interested in that topic.
>=20
> and would like to see http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28387/
> merged
> (instead of my patch).

In case you want to have a look, the DPDK page on the Debian
reproducible builds CI is the following:

https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/dpdk.htm=
l

A new build in experimental is failing but it looks like it's due to a
different version of GCC being used between different builds.

> If https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52076 gets merged, it will avoid
> the
> need for the others, except the above and
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/28391/
> The latter I have not found necessary so far, but races are hard to
> reproduce anyway.

That last one was tricky, I'd say it happens one out of ten builds.

Thanks for all your work, having the GNU Make wildcard sort out of the
box would be really great!

--=20
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi