From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Erik Gabriel Carrillo <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] eal: return true or false from lcore role
	check function
Date: Wed,  3 Jan 2018 12:43:34 -0600
Message-ID: <1515005015-31990-1-git-send-email-erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com,
	harry.van.haaren@intel.com
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522671B212
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  3 Jan 2018 19:43:44 +0100 (CET)
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

This patch updates the rte_lcore_has_role() function so that it returns
true/false instead of success/failure, which seems more intuitive given the
function name.

There is currently one call site for rte_lcore_has_role() and the caller uses
it (incorrectly) as though it returns true/false.  The call site can be updated
to use the existing definition instead, but this change can avoid similar
misuses in the future.

Erik Gabriel Carrillo (1):
  eal: return true or false from lcore role check function

 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_thread.c | 5 +----
 lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_lcore.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.6.4