From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dpdk: Allow for dynamic enablement of some isolated features Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 23:25:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1518265.xtD1UQCDPK@xps13> References: <1406665466-29654-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <5766264.li3nkTmgY6@xps13> <20140731143228.GB20718@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Neil Horman Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140731143228.GB20718-B26myB8xz7F8NnZeBjwnZQMhkBWG/bsMQH7oEaQurus@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 2014-07-31 10:32, Neil Horman: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:26:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Neil, we are mixing 2 different problems here. > > 1) we have to fix default build (without SSE-4.2) > > Thats nothing to fix, thats a configuration issue. Just build for a lesser > machine. I've already done that in the fedora build, using the defalut machine > target. What exactly is missing from that? I mean that building with RTE_MACHINE=default is broken in ixgbe and acl. So the main priority is to fix it. But performance of the native build must not be degraded. And if we can have good performance with a default build, it's fine. -- Thomas