* [PATCH] kni: optimizing the rte_kni_rx_burst
@ 2014-07-23 6:45 Hemant Agrawal
[not found] ` <14060979121185-git-send-email-Hemant-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hemant Agrawal @ 2014-07-23 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw
The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for buffers.
Irrespective of success or failure, it allocates the mbuf and try to put them into the alloc_q
if the buffers are not added to alloc_q, it frees them.
This waste lots of cpu cycles in allocating and freeing the buffers if alloc_q is full.
The logic has been changed to:
1. Initially allocand add buffer(burstsize) to alloc_q
2. Add buffers to alloc_q only when you are pulling out the buffers.
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <Hemant-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
---
lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
index 76feef4..01e85f8 100644
--- a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
+++ b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
@@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ rte_kni_alloc(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool,
ctx->in_use = 1;
+ /* Allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */
+ kni_allocate_mbufs(ctx);
+
return ctx;
fail:
@@ -369,8 +372,9 @@ rte_kni_rx_burst(struct rte_kni *kni, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned num)
{
unsigned ret = kni_fifo_get(kni->tx_q, (void **)mbufs, num);
- /* Allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */
- kni_allocate_mbufs(kni);
+ /* If buffers removed, allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */
+ if(ret)
+ kni_allocate_mbufs(kni);
return ret;
}
--
1.7.9.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread[parent not found: <14060979121185-git-send-email-Hemant-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] kni: optimizing the rte_kni_rx_burst [not found] ` <14060979121185-git-send-email-Hemant-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> @ 2014-11-11 22:58 ` Thomas Monjalon 2014-11-26 21:20 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2014-11-11 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw Is there anyone interested in KNI to review this patch please? 2014-07-23 12:15, Hemant Agrawal: > The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for buffers. > Irrespective of success or failure, it allocates the mbuf and try to put them into the alloc_q > if the buffers are not added to alloc_q, it frees them. > This waste lots of cpu cycles in allocating and freeing the buffers if alloc_q is full. > > The logic has been changed to: > 1. Initially allocand add buffer(burstsize) to alloc_q > 2. Add buffers to alloc_q only when you are pulling out the buffers. > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <Hemant-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> > --- > lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c > index 76feef4..01e85f8 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c > +++ b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c > @@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ rte_kni_alloc(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool, > > ctx->in_use = 1; > > + /* Allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */ > + kni_allocate_mbufs(ctx); > + > return ctx; > > fail: > @@ -369,8 +372,9 @@ rte_kni_rx_burst(struct rte_kni *kni, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned num) > { > unsigned ret = kni_fifo_get(kni->tx_q, (void **)mbufs, num); > > - /* Allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */ > - kni_allocate_mbufs(kni); > + /* If buffers removed, allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */ > + if(ret) > + kni_allocate_mbufs(kni); > > return ret; > } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kni: optimizing the rte_kni_rx_burst 2014-11-11 22:58 ` Thomas Monjalon @ 2014-11-26 21:20 ` Thomas Monjalon 2015-01-30 9:59 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2014-11-26 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw Ping 2014-11-11 23:58, Thomas Monjalon: > Is there anyone interested in KNI to review this patch please? > > > 2014-07-23 12:15, Hemant Agrawal: > > The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for buffers. > > Irrespective of success or failure, it allocates the mbuf and try to put them into the alloc_q > > if the buffers are not added to alloc_q, it frees them. > > This waste lots of cpu cycles in allocating and freeing the buffers if alloc_q is full. > > > > The logic has been changed to: > > 1. Initially allocand add buffer(burstsize) to alloc_q > > 2. Add buffers to alloc_q only when you are pulling out the buffers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <Hemant-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> > > --- > > lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c | 8 ++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c > > index 76feef4..01e85f8 100644 > > --- a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c > > +++ b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c > > @@ -263,6 +263,9 @@ rte_kni_alloc(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool, > > > > ctx->in_use = 1; > > > > + /* Allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */ > > + kni_allocate_mbufs(ctx); > > + > > return ctx; > > > > fail: > > @@ -369,8 +372,9 @@ rte_kni_rx_burst(struct rte_kni *kni, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned num) > > { > > unsigned ret = kni_fifo_get(kni->tx_q, (void **)mbufs, num); > > > > - /* Allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */ > > - kni_allocate_mbufs(kni); > > + /* If buffers removed, allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */ > > + if(ret) > > + kni_allocate_mbufs(kni); > > > > return ret; > > } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kni: optimizing the rte_kni_rx_burst 2014-11-26 21:20 ` Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-01-30 9:59 ` Thomas Monjalon 2015-02-24 1:29 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-01-30 9:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hemant Agrawal; +Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw 2014-11-26 22:20, Thomas Monjalon: > Ping > > 2014-11-11 23:58, Thomas Monjalon: > > Is there anyone interested in KNI to review this patch please? > > > > > > 2014-07-23 12:15, Hemant Agrawal: > > > The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for buffers. > > > Irrespective of success or failure, it allocates the mbuf and try to put them into the alloc_q > > > if the buffers are not added to alloc_q, it frees them. > > > This waste lots of cpu cycles in allocating and freeing the buffers if alloc_q is full. > > > > > > The logic has been changed to: > > > 1. Initially allocand add buffer(burstsize) to alloc_q > > > 2. Add buffers to alloc_q only when you are pulling out the buffers. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <Hemant-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> >From http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-January/011771.html, Jay said "The patch looks good from a DPDK 1.6r2 viewpoint. We saw the same behavior in our app and ended up avoiding it higher in the stack (in our code)." Reviewed-by: Jay Rolette <rolette-bIuJOMs36aleGPcbtGPokg@public.gmane.org> -- Thomas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kni: optimizing the rte_kni_rx_burst 2015-01-30 9:59 ` Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-02-24 1:29 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-02-24 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hemant Agrawal; +Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw > > > 2014-07-23 12:15, Hemant Agrawal: > > > > The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for buffers. > > > > Irrespective of success or failure, it allocates the mbuf and try to put them into the alloc_q > > > > if the buffers are not added to alloc_q, it frees them. > > > > This waste lots of cpu cycles in allocating and freeing the buffers if alloc_q is full. > > > > > > > > The logic has been changed to: > > > > 1. Initially allocand add buffer(burstsize) to alloc_q > > > > 2. Add buffers to alloc_q only when you are pulling out the buffers. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <Hemant-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> > > From http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-January/011771.html, Jay said > "The patch looks good from a DPDK 1.6r2 viewpoint. We saw the same behavior > in our app and ended up avoiding it higher in the stack (in our code)." > Reviewed-by: Jay Rolette <rolette-bIuJOMs36aleGPcbtGPokg@public.gmane.org> Applied, thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-24 1:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-23 6:45 [PATCH] kni: optimizing the rte_kni_rx_burst Hemant Agrawal
[not found] ` <14060979121185-git-send-email-Hemant-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-11 22:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-26 21:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-30 9:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-02-24 1:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).