From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/13] vhost: rxtx: prepare work for
	multiple queue support
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:24:09 +0200
Message-ID: <15234883.iyK6Fa9SCL@xps13>
References: <1444369572-1157-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <3814429.n33jvMuIcb@xps13> <20151020071004.GT3115@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, marcel@redhat.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com
 [209.85.212.180]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B148E9E
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:25:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so31394828wic.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151020071004.GT3115@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-10-20 15:10, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 08:57:52AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > -	if (unlikely(queue_id != VIRTIO_RXQ)) {
> > > -		LOG_DEBUG(VHOST_DATA, "mq isn't supported in this version.\n");
> > > +	if (unlikely(!is_valid_virt_queue_idx(queue_id, 0, dev->virt_qp_nb))) {
> > > +		RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_DATA,
> > > +			"%s (%"PRIu64"): virtqueue idx:%d invalid.\n",
> > > +			__func__, dev->device_fh, queue_id);
> > [...]
> > > -	if (unlikely(queue_id != VIRTIO_RXQ)) {
> > > -		LOG_DEBUG(VHOST_DATA, "mq isn't supported in this version.\n");
> > > +	if (unlikely(!is_valid_virt_queue_idx(queue_id, 0, dev->virt_qp_nb))) {
> > > +		RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_DATA,
> > > +			"%s (%"PRIu64"): virtqueue idx:%d invalid.\n",
> > > +			__func__, dev->device_fh, queue_id);
> > > +		return 0;
> > [...]
> > > -	if (unlikely(queue_id != VIRTIO_TXQ)) {
> > > -		LOG_DEBUG(VHOST_DATA, "mq isn't supported in this version.\n");
> > > +	if (unlikely(!is_valid_virt_queue_idx(queue_id, 1, dev->virt_qp_nb))) {
> > > +		RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_DATA,
> > > +			"%s (%"PRIu64"): virtqueue idx:%d invalid.\n",
> > > +			__func__, dev->device_fh, queue_id);
> > 
> > Why not use the log macros in drivers/net/virtio/virtio_logs.h?
> 
> Do you mean I should keep using LOG_DEBUG instead?

No you can use the error level.
Actually I was checking the logs in virtio which use some log wrapper to keep
some consistency. But the vhost code doesn't seem to have such policy.
So you are free :)
But I would say you should avoid changing the log format if does not comply
with the rest of the library. The __func__ macro is not really used.
Maybe Huawei could give a general policy for vhost logs (having a general
consistency in all DPDK libs is better).