From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Montorsi, Francesco" <fmontorsi@empirix.com>
Subject: Re: warnings when including DPDK headers from a C++17
 source file
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 13:00:16 +0000
Message-ID: <1531659613771.95891@empirix.com>
References: <1531489881821.76380@empirix.com>,
 <20180713085205.1a255bf3@xeon-e3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from bilemail1.empirix.com (bilemail1.empirix.com [208.67.76.245])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397052BD8
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 15 Jul 2018 15:00:18 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20180713085205.1a255bf3@xeon-e3>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi,=0A=
=0A=
________________________________________=0A=
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>=0A=
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 5:52 PM=0A=
To: Montorsi, Francesco=0A=
Cc: dev@dpdk.org=0A=
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] warnings when including DPDK headers from a C++17 s=
ource file=0A=
=0A=
> Why is DPDK code using register keyword at all? It is ignored by modern c=
ompilers.=0A=
=0A=
that's my question as well :)=0A=
=0A=
Maybe register keyword could be removed at least from header files to make =
the life easier to whoever is using C++17... right now I worked around that=
 by placing -Werror -Wno-register, but that's perhaps not the best solution=
=0A=
=0A=
Francesco=0A=
=0A=