From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] DPDK does not build on gcc 4.4, as it complains due to strict-aliasing rules in virtual_pmd and link_bonding_mode4 tests, with no errors in next gcc versions: Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 22:47:33 +0200 Message-ID: <1539174.vstNdTQhGW@xps13> References: <1427397455-30368-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <1427713576-31094-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Pablo de Lara Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1427713576-31094-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 2015-03-30 12:06, Pablo de Lara: > CC virtual_pmd.o > CC test_link_bonding_mode4.o > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /root/dpdk/app/test/test_link_bonding_mode4.c: In function =E2=80=98t= est_mode4_expired=E2=80=99: > /root/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_ring.h:645: error: = dereferencing pointer =E2=80=98pkt.409=E2=80=99 does break strict-alias= ing rules > /root/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_ring.h:729: error: = dereferencing pointer =E2=80=98pkt.409=E2=80=99 does break strict-alias= ing rules > ... > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /root/dpdk/app/test/virtual_pmd.c: In function =E2=80=98virtual_ethde= v_stats_reset=E2=80=99: > /root/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_ring.h:645: error: = dereferencing pointer =E2=80=98pkt.338=E2=80=99 does break strict-alias= ing rules > /root/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_ring.h:729: error: = dereferencing pointer =E2=80=98pkt.338=E2=80=99 does break strict-alias= ing rules >=20 > This patch fixes the compilation by disabling > these warnings. >=20 > Changes in v2: >=20 > Added missing gcc version check (checking if gcc 4.4 is present) >=20 > Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara Pawel's proposal was chosen because it doesn't require handling special= compiler version.