From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add ptype and xsum handling in i40e rx vpmd Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 22:26:23 +0200 Message-ID: <1542652.v1vhCPdXLZ@xps13> References: <1468515542-39207-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, helin.zhang@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, damarion@cisco.com To: Jeff Shaw Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAAB5320 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 22:26:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id f65so38474336wmi.0 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:26:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1468515542-39207-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-07-14 09:59, Jeff Shaw: > Our testing suggests minimal (in some cases zero) impact to core-bound > forwarding throughput as measured by testpmd. Throughput increase is > observed in l3fwd as now the vpmd can be used with hw_ip_checksum > enabled and without needing '--parse-ptype'. > > The benefits to applications using this functionality is realized when > Ethernet processing and L3/L4 checksum validation can be skipped. > > We hope others can also test performance in their applications while > conducting a review of this series. Thanks for the patches. They need some careful review and are a bit late for an integration in 16.07. Thus they are pending for 16.11.