From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal / malloc : alignment parameter check
	failing due to changes in rte_is_power_of_2
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:01:32 +0100
Message-ID: <1555477.4KJeR5JQaW@xps13>
References: <1421421030-22261-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
To: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <1421421030-22261-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>

2015-01-16 15:10, Declan Doherty:
> In commit 2fc8d6d the behaviour of function rte_is_power_of_2 was
> changed to not return true for 0. memzone_reserve_aligned_thread_unsafe
> and rte_malloc_socket both make the assumption that for align = 0
> !rte_is_power_of_2(align) will return false. This patch adds a check
> that align parameter is non-zero before doing the power of 2 check
> 
> Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
[...]
> -	if (!rte_is_power_of_2(align)) {
> +	if (align ? !rte_is_power_of_2(align) : 0) {
[...]
> -	if (size == 0 || !rte_is_power_of_2(align))
> +	if (size == 0 || align ? !rte_is_power_of_2(align) : 0)

I don't understand why you write "align ? !rte_is_power_of_2(align) : 0"
instead of the more readable "align && !rte_is_power_of_2(align)" ?

Pablo acked it so I guess there is something obvious I'm missing.

-- 
Thomas