From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Use Google Test as DPDK unit test framework Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:42:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1568995.VcFoQ8Pk7z@xps13> References: <1470170269-20721-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Ming =?utf-8?B?WmhhbyjotbXmmI4p?= , "Doherty, Declan" , dev@dpdk.org To: "Wiles, Keith" , Jim Murphy Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B821B2BB3 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 09:42:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id i5so24347760wmg.0 for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:42:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-08-04 19:55, Wiles, Keith: >=20 > > On Aug 4, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Jim Murphy wrote: > >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > We are looking at using our existing test environment for our DPDK > > applications that will run on our build servers. Hughpages therefor= e is an > > issue. What is involved in running DPDK without huge pages? >=20 > Command line option =E2=80=94no-huge should work. Note two dashs in = front. Most of drivers still require hugepages. A big rework would be needed to make them work without hugepages.