From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for various sample apps Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:31:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1570932.NB3qutnkrq@xps13> References: <1448633644-233692-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Pablo de Lara , bruce.richardson@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDE158D8 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:32:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so60492407wmw.0 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 06:32:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1448633644-233692-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-11-27 14:14, Pablo de Lara: > Co-maintain helloworld, l2fwd and dpdk-qat sample apps. Naive question: what is the benefit of dpdk-qat compared to l2fwd-crypto? Is it something we can drop?